Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34078283›Full record

ArticleBMC molecular and cell biology2021

Methodology for comprehensive cell-level analysis of wound healing experiments using deep learning in MATLAB.

Jan Oldenburg, Lisa Maletzki, Anne Strohbach, Paul Bellé, Stefan Siewert, Raila Busch, Stephan B Felix, Klaus-Peter Schmitz, Michael Stiehm

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC molecular and cell biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jan OldenburgInstitute for ImplantTechnology and Biomaterials e.V, Rostock, Germany. jan.oldenburg@uni-rostock.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1580-8531
Lisa MaletzkiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Anne StrohbachDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Paul BelléInstitute for ImplantTechnology and Biomaterials e.V, Rostock, Germany.
Stefan SiewertInstitute for ImplantTechnology and Biomaterials e.V, Rostock, Germany.
Raila BuschDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Stephan B FelixDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Klaus-Peter SchmitzInstitute for ImplantTechnology and Biomaterials e.V, Rostock, Germany.
Michael StiehmInstitute for ImplantTechnology and Biomaterials e.V, Rostock, Germany.
Institute for ImplantTechnology and Biomaterials · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

METAL IONS AND INFORMATION TRANSFER--MECHANISM OF RNA SYNTHESISZ01AG000044 · NIA · AGING · PI EICHHORN, G · 1985 to 1996
–
European Social Fund (ESF) and the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania ESF/14-BM-A55-0044/16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndothelial healing after deployment of cardiovascular devices is particularly important in the context of clinical outcome. It is therefore of great interest to develop tools for a precise prediction of endothelial growth after injury in the process of implant deployment. For experimental investigation of re-endothelialization in vitro cell migration assays are routinely used. However, semi-automatic analyses of live cell images are often based on gray value distributions and are as such limited by image quality and user dependence. The rise of deep learning algorithms offers promising opportunities for application in medical image analysis. Here, we present an intelligent cell detection (iCD) approach for comprehensive assay analysis to obtain essential characteristics on cell and population scale.

resultsIn an in vitro wound healing assay, we compared conventional analysis methods with our iCD approach. Therefore we determined cell density and cell velocity on cell scale and the movement of the cell layer as well as the gap closure between two cell monolayers on population scale. Our data demonstrate that cell density analysis based on deep learning algorithms is superior to an adaptive threshold method regarding robustness against image distortion. In addition, results on cell scale obtained with iCD are in agreement with manually velocity detection, while conventional methods, such as Cell Image Velocimetry (CIV), underestimate cell velocity by a factor of 0.5. Further, we found that iCD analysis of the monolayer movement gave results just as well as manual freehand detection, while conventional methods again shows more frayed leading edge detection compared to manual detection. Analysis of monolayer edge protrusion by ICD also produced results, which are close to manual estimation with an relative error of 11.7%. In comparison, the conventional Canny method gave a relative error of 76.4%.

conclusionThe results of our experiments indicate that deep learning algorithms such as our iCD have the ability to outperform conventional methods in the field of wound healing analysis. The combined analysis on cell and population scale using iCD is very well suited for timesaving and high quality wound healing analysis enabling the research community to gain detailed understanding of endothelial movement.

Indexed as

Deep LearningWound HealingCell TrackingEndothelium, VascularHumansCardiovascularCell scaleCNNEndothelial cellsNeural networkPopulation scaleUnetWound healing

Identifiers

PMID34078283
PMCPMC8170781
OpenAlexW3165336686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.