ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2021
Toward Dynamic Risk Prediction of Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Improving Risk Prediction With Intraoperative Events Using Gradient Boosting.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of cardiac surgery clinical prediction models that include intra-operative variables.Perfusion · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Perioperative Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review.Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)Pooled it
- Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting severe immediate postoperative complications in adults undergoing cardiac surgery.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence improves risk stratification for breast cancer recurrence and mortality in women exposed to pesticides: a call for reassessment of stratification criteria.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Towards a dynamic model to estimate evolving risk of major bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based hybrid risk estimation system (ERES) in cardiac surgery: Supplementary insights from the ASA score analysis.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Adverse Events after Cardiac Surgery.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Validation of machine learning-based risk stratification scores for patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.European heart journal. Digital health · 2024Article
- Intraoperative Features Improve Model Risk Predictions After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2024Article
- Performance Drift in Machine Learning Models for Cardiac Surgery Risk Prediction: Retrospective Analysis.JMIRx med · 2024Article
- The high-risk features among patients undergoing mitral valve operation for ischemic mitral regurgitation: The 3-strike score.JTCVS open · 2024Article
- Coronary Artery Surgery: Past, Present, and Future.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2024Review
- Predictive Analytics in Cardiothoracic Care: Enhancing Outcomes with the Healthcare Enabled by Artificial Intelligence in Real Time (HEART) Project.Journal of Maine Medical Center · 2024Article
- Multiple Layers of Care and Risk: Comparing Cross-Specialty Outcomes Using Regional, Hospital, and Patient-Level Data.JACC. Advances · 2022Article
- Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Long-Term Mortality in Patients After Cardiac Surgery.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntraoperative data may improve models predicting postoperative events. We evaluated the effect of incorporating intraoperative variables to the existing preoperative model on the predictive performance of the model for coronary artery bypass graft.
methodsWe analyzed 378 572 isolated coronary artery bypass graft cases performed across 1083 centers, using the national Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database between 2014 and 2016. Outcomes were operative mortality, 5 postoperative complications, and composite representation of all events. We fitted models by logistic regression or extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). For each modeling approach, we used preoperative only, intraoperative only, or pre+intraoperative variables. We developed 84 models with unique combinations of the 3 variable sets, 2 variable selection methods, 2 modeling approaches, and 7 outcomes. Each model was tested in 20 iterations of 70:30 stratified random splitting into development/testing samples. Model performances were evaluated on the testing dataset using the C statistic, area under the precision-recall curve, and calibration metrics, including the Brier score.
resultsThe mean patient age was 65.3 years, and 24.7% were women. Operative mortality, excluding intraoperative death, occurred in 1.9%. In all outcomes, models that considered pre+intraoperative variables demonstrated significantly improved Brier score and area under the precision-recall curve compared with models considering pre or intraoperative variables alone. XGBoost without external variable selection had the best C statistics, Brier score, and area under the precision-recall curve values in 4 of the 7 outcomes (mortality, renal failure, prolonged ventilation, and composite) compared with logistic regression models with or without variable selection. Based on the calibration plots, risk restratification for mortality showed that the logistic regression model underestimated the risk in 11 114 patients (9.8%) and overestimated in 12 005 patients (10.6%). In contrast, the XGBoost model underestimated the risk in 7218 patients (6.4%) and overestimated in 0 patients (0%).
conclusionsIn isolated coronary artery bypass graft, adding intraoperative variables to preoperative variables resulted in improved predictions of all 7 outcomes. Risk models based on XGBoost may provide a better prediction of adverse events to guide clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.