Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34077760›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2021

Large-scale machine-learning-based phenotyping significantly improves genomic discovery for optic nerve head morphology.

Babak Alipanahi, Farhad Hormozdiari, Babak Behsaz, Justin Cosentino, Zachary R McCaw, Emanuel Schorsch, D Sculley, Elizabeth H Dorfman, Paul J Foster, Lily H Peng and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Genetic discovery using deep learning-derived optic nerve integrity phenotypes.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Babak AlipanahiGoogle Health, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. Electronic address: babaka@google.com.
Farhad HormozdiariGoogle Health, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Babak BehsazGoogle Health, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Justin CosentinoGoogle Health, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Zachary R McCawGoogle Health, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Emanuel SchorschGoogle Health, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
D SculleyGoogle Health, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Elizabeth H DorfmanGoogle Health, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Paul J FosterNIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London EC1V 9EL, UK.
Lily H PengGoogle Health, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Sonia PheneGoogle Health, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Naama HammelGoogle Health, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Andrew CarrollGoogle Health, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Anthony P KhawajaNIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London EC1V 9EL, UK; MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SL, UK.
Cory Y McLeanGoogle Health, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA. Electronic address: cym@google.com.
Google (United States) · USMoorfields Eye Hospital · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/1Medical Research Council MR/N003284/1Medical Research Council MR/T040912/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) require accurate cohort phenotyping, but expert labeling can be costly, time intensive, and variable. Here, we develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict glaucomatous optic nerve head features from color fundus photographs. We used the model to predict vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR), a diagnostic parameter and cardinal endophenotype for glaucoma, in 65,680 Europeans in the UK Biobank (UKB). A GWAS of ML-based VCDR identified 299 independent genome-wide significant (GWS; p ≤ 5 × 10

Indexed as

Machine LearningDatasets as TopicFluorescein AngiographyGenome-Wide Association StudyGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansModels, AnatomicOptic DiskPhenotypeRisk AssessmentGWAS, phenotyping, machine learning, glaucoma

Identifiers

PMID34077760
PMCPMC8322934
OpenAlexW3107355209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.