ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2021
Implementation of endoscopic submucosal dissection in a country with a low incidence of gastric cancer: Results from a prospective national registry.
Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in the elderly: Spanish multicenter prospective study during initial experience.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric dysplasia and early neoplasia in a United Kingdom Caucasian population.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Outcomes and validity of risk stratification tools for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer in Western Australia.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Article
- Unveiling clinicopathologic features and outcomes for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer at gastric angulus in China.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Histopathological features of glandular atrophy of the lamina propria of the gastric mucosa during its occurrence and development.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Endoscopic Treatment of Superficial Gastric Cancer: Present Status and Future.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- Implementation of endoscopic submucosal dissection in a country with a low incidence of gastric cancer: Results from a prospective national registry.United European gastroenterology journal · 2021Article
- Implementation of endoscopic submucosal dissection in a country with a low incidence of gastric cancer: Results from a prospective national registry.United European gastroenterology journal · 2021Article
- Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of superficial gastric neoplasms in non-Asian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the treatment of choice for early gastric malignancies. In recent years, the ESD technique has been implemented in Western countries with increasing use.
objectivesTo describe the results of gastric ESD in a Western country with a low incidence of gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe prospective national registry was conducted over 4 years in 23 hospitals, including 30 endoscopists. Epithelial and subepithelial lesions (SEL) qualified to complete removal with ESD were assessed. The technique, instruments, and solution for submucosal injection varied at the endoscopist's discretion. ESD was defined as difficult when: en-bloc resection was not achieved, had to be converted to a hybrid resection, lasted more than 2 h or an intraprocedural perforation occurred. Additionally, independent risk factors for difficult ESD were analyzed.
resultsTwo hundred and thirty gastric ESD in 225 patients were performed from January 2016 to December 2019 (196 epithelial and 34 SEL). Most lesions were located in the lower stomach (111; 48.3%). One hundred and twenty-eight (55.6%) ESD were considered difficult. The median procedure time was 105 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 60-150). The procedure time for SEL was shorter than for epithelial lesions (90 min [45-121] vs. 110 min [62-160]; p = 0.038). En-bloc, R0, and curative resection rates were 91.3%, 75.2%, and 70.9%, respectively. Difficult ESD had lower R0 resection rates than ESD that did not meet the difficulty criteria (64.8% and 87.6%; p = 0.000, respectively). Fibrosis and poor maneuverability were independent factors associated with difficult ESD (OR 3.6, 95%CI 1.1-11.74 and OR 5.07, 95%CI 1.6-16.08; respectively).
conclusionsAlthough the number of cases is limited, the results of this analysis show acceptable en-bloc and R0 rates in gastric ESD considering the wide variability in experience among the operators. Fibrosis and poor maneuverability were associated with more difficulty in completing ESD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.