Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34077636›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2021

Implementation of endoscopic submucosal dissection in a country with a low incidence of gastric cancer: Results from a prospective national registry.

Gloria Fernández-Esparrach, José-Carlos Marín-Gabriel, Alberto H de Tejada, Eduardo Albéniz, Oscar Nogales, Andres J Del Pozo-García, Pedro J Rosón, Unai Goicotxea, Hugo Uchima, Alvaro Terán and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Gloria Fernández-EsparrachEndoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, ICMDM, CIBEREHD, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3378-3940
José-Carlos Marín-GabrielEndoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, "i+12 Research Institute", Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Alberto H de TejadaEndoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, IDIPHISA, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Eduardo AlbénizComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarrabiomed Biomedical Research Center, UPNA, IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.
Oscar NogalesHospital Gregorio Marañón, Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Andres J Del Pozo-GarcíaEndoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, "i+12 Research Institute", Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Pedro J RosónHospital Quirón, Málaga, Spain.
Unai GoicotxeaHospital Universitario de Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain.
Hugo UchimaCentro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alvaro TeránHospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Alvarez AlbertoComplejo Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Rodríguez-Sánchez JoaquínHospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Rivero-Sánchez LisethEndoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, ICMDM, CIBEREHD, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Santiago JoséEndoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, IDIPHISA, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
en representación del grupo de DSE de la SEED
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Salamanca · ESHospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Quirónsalud Barcelona · ESHospital Quirón Teknon · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the treatment of choice for early gastric malignancies. In recent years, the ESD technique has been implemented in Western countries with increasing use.

objectivesTo describe the results of gastric ESD in a Western country with a low incidence of gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe prospective national registry was conducted over 4 years in 23 hospitals, including 30 endoscopists. Epithelial and subepithelial lesions (SEL) qualified to complete removal with ESD were assessed. The technique, instruments, and solution for submucosal injection varied at the endoscopist's discretion. ESD was defined as difficult when: en-bloc resection was not achieved, had to be converted to a hybrid resection, lasted more than 2 h or an intraprocedural perforation occurred. Additionally, independent risk factors for difficult ESD were analyzed.

resultsTwo hundred and thirty gastric ESD in 225 patients were performed from January 2016 to December 2019 (196 epithelial and 34 SEL). Most lesions were located in the lower stomach (111; 48.3%). One hundred and twenty-eight (55.6%) ESD were considered difficult. The median procedure time was 105 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 60-150). The procedure time for SEL was shorter than for epithelial lesions (90 min [45-121] vs. 110 min [62-160]; p = 0.038). En-bloc, R0, and curative resection rates were 91.3%, 75.2%, and 70.9%, respectively. Difficult ESD had lower R0 resection rates than ESD that did not meet the difficulty criteria (64.8% and 87.6%; p = 0.000, respectively). Fibrosis and poor maneuverability were independent factors associated with difficult ESD (OR 3.6, 95%CI 1.1-11.74 and OR 5.07, 95%CI 1.6-16.08; respectively).

conclusionsAlthough the number of cases is limited, the results of this analysis show acceptable en-bloc and R0 rates in gastric ESD considering the wide variability in experience among the operators. Fibrosis and poor maneuverability were associated with more difficulty in completing ESD.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleFibrosisGastric MucosaHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRegistriesSpainearly gastric canceren-blocendoscopic resectionendoscopic submucosal dissectiongastric premalignant lesionsresection

Identifiers

PMID34077636
PMCPMC8280798
OpenAlexW3164320081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.