ReviewUnited European gastroenterology journal2021
Post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy: Comparison of the updated guidelines.
Review in United European gastroenterology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Computer-Assisted Detection (CADe) of colonic polyps during colonoscopy reduces cancer-related healthcare costs - a single Singaporean institution cost effectiveness analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Demographic and Clinicopathologic Factors Associated With Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence.JAMA network open · 2026Observational
- A screening model for advanced colorectal neoplasia based on tumor markers and inflammatory indices: a retrospective study with an online risk calculator.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Preoperative risk stratification for pathological upgrading in colorectal polyps using explainable machine learning: implications for screening optimization and resource allocation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Navigating the Terrain of Post-Polypectomy Surveillance: Charting the Complex Landscape of Guidelines and Recurrence Risks.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Mutational Analysis of Early, Low-Grade Bowel Polyps Defines a Subgroup with Concurrent, High-Risk Oncogenic Drivers Independent of Polyp Size.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Risk of total metachronous advanced neoplasia after detection of proximal hyperplastic polyps, adenomas, and their combination.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Appropriateness of Recommendations for Surveillance Colonoscopy After Polypectomy-A Comparison of Adherence to the 2012 and 2020 USMSTF Guidelines.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- Efficacy-cost analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection and cold snare polypectomy: A propensity score matching analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical and Endoscopic Characteristics of Patients with Oligopolyposis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Colorectal Cancer Screening using Immunochemical Faecal Occult Blood Testing (iFOBT) in Urban-Poor Communities in Cheras, Malaysia: A Cross-Sectional Study.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2025Article
- Multicenter prospective cohort study on colorectal adenoma recurrence and malignant transformation risk based on integrative medicine: a study protocol.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Real-World Assessment of the Efficacy of Computer-Assisted Diagnosis in Colonoscopy: A Single Institution Cohort Study in Singapore.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Article
- Closing the Gap: A Critical Examination of Adherence, Inconsistency, and Improvements in Colonoscopy Reporting Practices.Digestion · 2024Article
- The imitation game: a review of the use of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy, and endoscopists' perceptions thereof.Annals of coloproctology · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Aided Endoscopy and Colorectal Cancer Screening.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Sporadic hyperplastic polyp associated with above-average risk of developing metachronous colorectal cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- Post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy: Comparison of the updated guidelines.United European gastroenterology journal · 2021Review
- Systematic meta-review: diagnostic accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy for colonic neoplasia with umbrella meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently, three updated guidelines for post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance (PPCS) have been published. These guidelines are based on a comprehensive summary of the literature, while some recommendations are similar, different surveillance intervals are recommended after detection of specific types of polyps.
aimIn this review, we aimed to compare and contrast these recommendations.
methodsThe updated guidelines for PPCS were reviewed and the recommendations were compared.
resultsFor patients with 1-4 adenomas <10 mm with low-grade dysplasia, irrespective of villous components, or 1-4 serrated polyps <10 mm without dysplasia, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) and Public Health England (PHE) (BSG/ACPGBI/PHE) guidelines do not recommend colonoscopic surveillance and instead recommend that the participate in routine CRC screening program (typically based on the fecal immunochemical test), while the USMSTF recommends surveillance colonoscopies 7-10 years after diagnosis of 1-2 tubular adenomas <10 mm and 3-5 years for 3-4 tubular adenomas of the same size. The USMSTF define adenomas with tubulovillous or villous histology as high-risk adenomas; thus, surveillance colonoscopy is recommended after 3 years. However, the ESGE and BSG do not consider such histology as a criterion for repeating colonoscopy at this short interval. For patients with 1-2 sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) <10 mm and those with 3-4 SSPs <10 mm, the USMSTF recommends surveillance colonosocopy after 5-10 and 3-5 years, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.