ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2021
New Approach Methodology for Assessing Inhalation Risks of a Contact Respiratory Cytotoxicant: Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Aerosol Dosimetry Modeling for Cross-Species and In Vitro Comparisons.
Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- A peat-burning smoke exposure model and its effects on ratpulmonary tissue.Open veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Establishing scientific confidence: human biological relevance of reconstructed human respiratory epithelium (RHRE) for assessing respiratory effects.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- Improved aerosol deposition predictions in human upper respiratory tract using coupled mesh phantom-based computational model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Two- and Three-Dimensional Culture Systems: Respiratory In Vitro Tissue Models for Chemical Screening and Risk-Based Decision Making.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Evaluation of a non-animal toolbox informed by adverse outcome pathways for human inhalation safety.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025Article
- Quantitative adverse outcome pathway modeling for cigarette smoke-inducible airway mucus hypersecretion. Part 2: Bayesian network modeling for probabilistic risk estimation.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025Article
- Cellular responses of lung cells cultured at an Air-liquid Interface are influenced by spatial nanoparticle deposition patterns in anAerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2025Article
- Subject-Specific Multi-Scale Modeling of the Fate of Inhaled Aerosols.Journal of aerosol science · 2025Article
- Differences in the anatomy and physiology of the human and rat respiratory tracts and impact on toxicological assessments.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2024Review
- New approach methodologies (NAMs) for theFrontiers in toxicology · 2024Review
- Refinement of the acute inhalation limit test for inert, nano-sized dusts by anFrontiers in toxicology · 2023Article
- Article
- Use of new approach methodologies (NAMs) to meet regulatory requirements for the assessment of tobacco and other nicotine-containing products.Frontiers in toxicology · 2022Article
- Use of new approach methodologies (NAMs) to meet regulatory requirements for the assessment of industrial chemicals and pesticides for effects on human health.Frontiers in toxicology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Regulatory agencies are considering alternative approaches to assessing inhalation toxicity that utilizes in vitro studies with human cells and in silico modeling in lieu of additional animal studies. In support of this goal, computational fluid-particle dynamics models were developed to estimate site-specific deposition of inhaled aerosols containing the fungicide, chlorothalonil, in the rat and human for comparisons to prior rat inhalation studies and new human in vitro studies. Under bioassay conditions, the deposition was predicted to be greatest at the front of the rat nose followed by the anterior transitional epithelium and larynx corresponding to regions most sensitive to local contact irritation and cytotoxicity. For humans, simulations of aerosol deposition covering potential occupational or residential exposures (1-50 µm diameter) were conducted using nasal and oral breathing. Aerosols in the 1-5 µm range readily penetrated the deep region of the human lung following both oral and nasal breathing. Under actual use conditions (aerosol formulations >10 µm), the majority of deposited doses were in the upper conducting airways. Beyond the nose or mouth, the greatest deposition in the pharynx, larynx, trachea, and bronchi was predicted for aerosols in the 10-20 µm size range. Only small amounts of aerosols >20 µm penetrated past the pharyngeal region. Using the ICRP clearance model, local retained tissue dose metrics including maximal concentrations and areas under the curve were calculated for each airway region following repeated occupational exposures. These results are directly comparable with benchmark doses from in vitro toxicity studies in human cells leading to estimated human equivalent concentrations that reduce the reliance on animals for risk assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.