Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34077459›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Interfacial polarization of in vivo rat sciatic nerve with crush injury studied via broadband dielectric spectroscopy.

Risa Otagiri, Hideki Kawai, Masanobu Takatsuka, Naoki Shinyashiki, Akira Ito, Ryosuke Ikeguchi, Tomoki Aoyama

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 62% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Risa OtagiriCourse of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Tokai University, Hiratsuka City, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hideki KawaiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate school of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto City, Kyoto, Japan.
Masanobu TakatsukaCourse of Science and Technology, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Tokai University, Hiratsuka City, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1307-1476
Naoki ShinyashikiDepartment of Physics, School of Science, Tokai University, Hiratsuka City, Kanagawa, Japan.
Akira ItoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate school of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto City, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9645-9777
Ryosuke IkeguchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto City, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomoki AoyamaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate school of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto City, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3512-054X
Kyoto University · JPTokai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical stimulation is one of the candidates for elongation-driven regeneration of damaged peripheral nerves. Different organs and tissues have an inherent cell structure and size. This leads to variation in the tissue-specific electrical properties of the frequency of interfacial polarization. Although nervous tissues have a membrane potential, the electrical reaction inside these tissues following electrical stimulation from outside remains unexplored. Furthermore, the pathophysiological reaction of an injured nerve is unclear. Here, we investigated the electrical reaction of injured and non-injured rat sciatic nerves via broadband dielectric spectroscopy. Crush injured and non-injured sciatic nerves of six 12-week-old male Lewis rats were used, 6 days after infliction of the injury. Both sides of the nerves (with and without injury) were exposed, and impedance measurements were performed at room temperature (approximately 25°C) at frequencies ranging from 100 mHz to 5.5 MHz and electric potential ranging from 0.100 to 1.00 V. The measured interfacial polarization potentially originated from the polarization by ion transport around nerve membranes at frequencies between 3.2 kHz and 1.6 MHz. The polarization strength of the injured nerves was smaller than that of non-injured nerves. However, the difference in polarization between injured and non-injured nerves might be caused by inflammation and edema. The suitable frequency range of the interfacial polarization can be expected to be critical for electrical stimulation of injured peripheral nerves.

Indexed as

AnimalsCrush InjuriesDielectric SpectroscopyDisease Models, AnimalElectric StimulationElectronics, MedicalMaleNerve CrushNerve RegenerationRatsSciatic Nerve

Identifiers

PMID34077459
PMCPMC8171940
OpenAlexW3165191969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.