Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34077424›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Sensitivity and Specificity of two rapid tests for the diagnosis of infection by Trypanosoma cruzi in a Colombian population.

Sandra Helena Suescún-Carrero, Lyda Pilar Salamanca-Cardozo, María-Jesus Pinazo, Lluis Armadans-Gil

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Laboratory diagnosis ofFrontiers in parasitology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandra Helena Suescún-CarreroGrupo de Investigación del Laboratorio de Salud Pública de Boyacá, Secretaria de Salud de Boyacá, Tunja, Colombia, Doctorado en Metodología de la Investigación Biomédica y Salud Pública, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5821-4421
Lyda Pilar Salamanca-CardozoGrupo de Investigación del Laboratorio de Salud Pública de Boyacá, Secretaria de Salud de Boyacá, Tunja, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-5327-0317
María-Jesus PinazoBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clinic-University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Lluis Armadans-GilServicio de Medicina Preventiva y Epidemiología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0153-9855
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESUniversity of Boyaca · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate diagnostic precision of two rapid diagnostic tests (RDT's) on patients with chronic Chagas disease. METHODOLOGY: Prospective study with the following inclusion criteria: subjects older than 3 years, signed informed consent. Exclusion criterion: subjects could not have previously received treatment for infection with T. cruzi. The study population were participants in a screening process undertaken in rural and urban zones of the department Boyacá, Colombia. Two RDT's were performed to all participants: the Chagas Detect Plus InBios (CDP) and the Chagas Stat-Pak (CSP) and as a reference standard the ELISA Chagas III GrupoBios and the Chagas ELISA IgG+IgM I Vircell tests were used. In the case of discordant results between the two ELISA tests, an indirect immunofluorescence was done.

resultsThree hundred-five (305) subjects were included in the study (38 patients with leishmaniasis), of which 215 tested negative for T cruzi and 90 tested positive according to the reference standard. The sensitivity of the RDT's were 100% (CI 95% 95.9-100), and the specificity of the CDP was 99.1% (CI 95% 96.6-99.8) and for CSP was 100% (CI 95% 98.3-100). The agreement of CDP was 99.5% and for CSP was 100% with Kappa values of (k = 99.1; CI 95% 92.6-99.8%) and (k = 100; CI 95% 94.3-100), respectively. RDT's did not present cross-reactions with samples from patients who were positive for leishmaniasis.

conclusionsThe findings demonstrate excellent results from the RDT's in terms of validity, safety, and reproducibility. The results obtained provide evidence for the recommendation for using these tests in a Colombian epidemiological context principally in endemic areas in which laboratory installations necessary to perform conventional tests are not available, or they are scarce and to help in diagnosing chronic Chagas disease in order to provide access to treatment as soon as possible.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, ProtozoanChagas DiseaseChildChild, PreschoolColombiaDiagnostic Tests, RoutineEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAntibodies, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID34077424
PMCPMC8202949
OpenAlexW3164159629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.