ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2021
Temporally precise population coding of dynamic sounds by auditory cortex.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hierarchical transformations in sound envelope encoding differ across cortical layers.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026Article
- Neural Response Reliability as a Marker of the Transition of Neural Codes along Auditory Pathways.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Decoding of frequency-modulated sweeps by core and belt neurons in the alert macaque auditory cortex.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Interareal and interlaminar differences in sound envelope encoding in core and parabelt auditory cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Deep neural networks explain spiking activity in auditory cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Hierarchical emergence of opponent coding in auditory belt cortex.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Encoding of Vibrotactile Stimuli by Mechanoreceptors in Rodent Glabrous Skin.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Hierarchical differences in the encoding of amplitude modulation in the subcortical auditory system of awake nonhuman primates.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Neurometric amplitude modulation detection in the inferior colliculus of Young and Aged rats.Hearing research · 2024Article
- A robust and compact population code for competing sounds in auditory cortex.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Parvalbumin neurons enhance temporal coding and reduce cortical noise in complex auditory scenes.Communications biology · 2023Article
- A Redundant Cortical Code for Speech Envelope.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Time-locked auditory cortical responses in the high-gamma band: A window into primary auditory cortex.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluctuations in the amplitude envelope of complex sounds provide critical cues for hearing, particularly for speech and animal vocalizations. Responses to amplitude modulation (AM) in the ascending auditory pathway have chiefly been described for single neurons. How neural populations might collectively encode and represent information about AM remains poorly characterized, even in primary auditory cortex (A1). We modeled population responses to AM based on data recorded from A1 neurons in awake squirrel monkeys and evaluated how accurately single trial responses to modulation frequencies from 4 to 512 Hz could be decoded as functions of population size, composition, and correlation structure. We found that a population-based decoding model that simulated convergent, equally weighted inputs was highly accurate and remarkably robust to the inclusion of neurons that were individually poor decoders. By contrast, average rate codes based on convergence performed poorly; effective decoding using average rates was only possible when the responses of individual neurons were segregated, as in classical population decoding models using labeled lines. The relative effectiveness of dynamic rate coding in auditory cortex was explained by shared modulation phase preferences among cortical neurons, despite heterogeneity in rate-based modulation frequency tuning. Our results indicate significant population-based synchrony in primary auditory cortex and suggest that robust population coding of the sound envelope information present in animal vocalizations and speech can be reliably achieved even with indiscriminate pooling of cortical responses. These findings highlight the importance of firing rate dynamics in population-based sensory coding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.