Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34077273›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2021

Temporally precise population coding of dynamic sounds by auditory cortex.

Joshua D Downer, James Bigelow, Melissa J Runfeldt, Brian J Malone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Encoding of Vibrotactile Stimuli by Mechanoreceptors in Rodent Glabrous Skin.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Redundant Cortical Code for Speech Envelope.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua D DownerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California.
James BigelowDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-1658-6021
Melissa J RunfeldtDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Brian J MaloneDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-4073-6755

Funding

Auditory Cortical Processing in Hearing LossR01DC017396 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SCHREINER, CHRISTOPH E. · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Cortical reorganization and signal-in-noise processing following asymmetric hearing lossF32DC016846 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BIGELOW, JAMES · 2018 to 2021
$202k
Functional organization of primate auditory cortex: a comparison between monkey and humanF32DC016535 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DOWNER, JOSHUA D · 2017 to 2019
$179k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC016535NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC016846NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluctuations in the amplitude envelope of complex sounds provide critical cues for hearing, particularly for speech and animal vocalizations. Responses to amplitude modulation (AM) in the ascending auditory pathway have chiefly been described for single neurons. How neural populations might collectively encode and represent information about AM remains poorly characterized, even in primary auditory cortex (A1). We modeled population responses to AM based on data recorded from A1 neurons in awake squirrel monkeys and evaluated how accurately single trial responses to modulation frequencies from 4 to 512 Hz could be decoded as functions of population size, composition, and correlation structure. We found that a population-based decoding model that simulated convergent, equally weighted inputs was highly accurate and remarkably robust to the inclusion of neurons that were individually poor decoders. By contrast, average rate codes based on convergence performed poorly; effective decoding using average rates was only possible when the responses of individual neurons were segregated, as in classical population decoding models using labeled lines. The relative effectiveness of dynamic rate coding in auditory cortex was explained by shared modulation phase preferences among cortical neurons, despite heterogeneity in rate-based modulation frequency tuning. Our results indicate significant population-based synchrony in primary auditory cortex and suggest that robust population coding of the sound envelope information present in animal vocalizations and speech can be reliably achieved even with indiscriminate pooling of cortical responses. These findings highlight the importance of firing rate dynamics in population-based sensory coding.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionFemaleNeuronsSaimiriTime FactorsVocalization, Animalauditorycortexdecodinghearingpopulation coding

Identifiers

PMID34077273
PMCPMC8325602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.