Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34076869›Full record

Trial reportReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2022

Reproductive Outcomes of Different Sperm Selection Techniques for ICSI Patients with Abnormal Sperm DNA Fragmentation: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Manar Hozyen, Eman Hasanen, Khaled Elqusi, Salma ElTanbouly, Samar Gamal, Abdul Ghafar Hussin, Hanaa AlKhader, Hosam Zaki

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04482517 (Reproductive Outcomes of Different Sperm Selection Techniques; Density Gradient Centrifugation, Testicular Sperm, PICSI, and MACS for ICSI Patients With Abnormal Sperm DNA Fragmentation), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04482517 nacompletednot on this map

Reproductive Outcomes of Different Sperm Selection Techniques; Density Gradient Centrifugation, Testicular Sperm, PICSI, and MACS for ICSI Patients With Abnormal Sperm DNA Fragmentation

TypeinterventionalSponsorGanin Fertility CenterRan2017 to 2018Enrolled320ConditionsInfertility, MaleArmsDensity Gradient Centrifugation, Physiological ICSI, Magnetic activated cell sorting, Testicular sperm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Sperm Selection Procedures in Cases of High Sperm DNA Fragmentation Index.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  7. The role of sperm DNA fragmentation in reproduction: a SWOT analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manar HozyenGanin Fertility Center, Cairo, 11728, Egypt. manarnrc@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9105-7648
Eman HasanenGanin Fertility Center, Cairo, 11728, Egypt.
Khaled ElqusiGanin Fertility Center, Cairo, 11728, Egypt.
Salma ElTanboulyGanin Fertility Center, Cairo, 11728, Egypt.
Samar GamalGanin Fertility Center, Cairo, 11728, Egypt.
Abdul Ghafar HussinGanin Fertility Center, Cairo, 11728, Egypt.
Hanaa AlKhaderGanin Fertility Center, Cairo, 11728, Egypt.
Hosam ZakiGanin Fertility Center, Cairo, 11728, Egypt.
Cairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study is to compare the reproductive outcomes of different sperm selection techniques: density gradient centrifugation (DGC), testicular sperm (Testi), physiological ICSI (PICSI), and magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) in abnormal sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) ICSI patients. A randomized controlled trial included 302 patients with abnormal SDF undergoing ICSI where they were randomized into 4 groups: a control group of DGC (n= 72), Testi (n=73), PICSI (n=78), and MACS (n=79). Results showed no significant differences in the male age, female age, or SDF between the four groups. Testi group had significantly lower cleavage and blastulation rates compared to PICSI, DGC, or MACS groups (p =0.001). For the high-quality blastocysts, DGC and MACS groups had significantly higher rate than the Testi group (p =0.014). The highest pregnancy rate was scored for the PICSI group (69.6%), while the lowest pregnancy rate was scored for the DGC group (51.4%) with (p =0.025). The PICSI group showed a significantly higher implantation rate compared to the other groups (p =0.003). Regarding the ongoing pregnancy rate, the significant difference was observed between the PICSI (62.8%) and MACS (62%) vs. DGC (45.8%). Besides, no significant differences were found in the miscarriage rates between the four groups. In conclusion, PICSI and MACS along with DGC showed significant improvement in embryological and clinical outcome over testicular sperm or sperm processed by DGC alone in patients with abnormal SDFRegistration number: NCT04482517.

Indexed as

DNA FragmentationSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicAdultEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansMalePregnancyPregnancy RateSpermatozoaMACSPICSISperm DNA fragmentationSperm selectionTesticular sperm

Identifiers

PMID34076869
OpenAlexW3164964717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.