ArticleEJNMMI physics2021
Radiopharmacokinetic modelling and radiation dose assessment of
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Normal Tissue Dosimetry of IntraperitonealJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- Radium - from discovery to the present day - narrative review.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Biokinetic modelling of the exhalation ofRadiation and environmental biophysics · 2026Article
- Diffusing alpha-emitters radiation therapy: In vivo measurements of effective diffusion and clearance rates across multiple tumor types.Medical physics · 2025Article
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Advancing Theranostics Dosimetry for Cancer Therapy: a Review.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Review
- Characterization of Effective Half-Life for Instant Single-Time-Point Dosimetry Using Machine Learning.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- Establishment of a practical methodology for evaluating equieffective dose of individual patients based on RT-PHITS.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Correction: Radiopharmacokinetic modelling and radiation dose assessment ofEJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Heterogeneity of absorbed dose distribution in kidney tissues and dose-response modelling of nephrotoxicity in radiopharmaceutical therapy with beta-particle emitters: A review.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Review
- Radiopharmaceuticals for Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Current Approaches and Future Directions.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Review
- Heterogeneity of dose distribution in normal tissues in case of radiopharmaceutical therapy with alpha-emitting radionuclides.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2022Review
- Comparing absorbed doses and radiation risk of the α-emitting bone-seekers [Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- The enduring legacy of Marie Curie: impacts of radium in 21st century radiological and medical sciences.International journal of radiation biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRa-223 dichloride (
methodsThe most recent systemic biokinetic model of
resultsThe distribution of
conclusionThe biokinetic modelling of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.