Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34076782›Full record

ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2021

[Perioperative analgesia with nonopioid analgesics : Joint interdisciplinary consensus-based recommendations of the German Pain Society, the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the German Society of Surgery].

Ulrike M Stamer, Joachim Erlenwein, Stephan M Freys, Thomas Stammschulte, Dirk Stichtenoth, Stefan Wirz

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. [Tumor-associated pain].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ulrike M StamerUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie, Inselspital, Universität Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Schweiz. ulrike.stamer@dbmr.unibe.ch.
Joachim ErlenweinKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Stephan M FreysChirurgische Klinik, DIAKO Ev. Diakonie-Krankenhaus Bremen, Bremen, Deutschland.
Thomas Stammschulte, Bern, Schweiz.
Dirk StichtenothInstitut für Klinische Pharmakologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
Stefan WirzAbteilung für Anästhesie, Interdisziplinäre Intensivmedizin, Schmerzmedizin/Palliativmedizin, Zentrum für Schmerzmedizin, Weaningzentrum, CURA - GFO-Kliniken Bonn, Bad Honnef, Deutschland.
Alzheimer Schweiz · CHArbeitsgemeinschaft Urologische Onkologie · DEDeutsche Schmerzgesellschaft · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonopioid analgesics are frequently used for perioperative analgesia; however, insufficient research is available on several practical issues. Often hospitals have no strategy for how to proceed, e.g., for informing patients or for the timing of perioperative administration of nonopioid analgesics.

methodsAn expert panel representing the German national societies of pain, anaesthesiology and intensive care medicine and surgery developed recommendations for the perioperative use of nonopioid analgesics within a formal, structured consensus process.

resultsThe panel agreed that nonopioid analgesics shall be part of a multimodal analgesia concept and that patients have to be informed preoperatively about possible complications and alternative treatment options. Patients' history of pain and analgesic intake shall be evaluated. Patients at risk of severe postoperative pain and possible chronification of postsurgical pain shall be identified. Depending on the duration of surgery, nonopioid analgesics can already be administered preoperatively or intraoperatively so that plasma concentrations are sufficient after emergence from anesthesia. Nonopioid analgesics or combinations of analgesics shall be administered for a limited time only. An interdisciplinary written standard of care, comprising the nonopioid analgesic of choice, possible alternatives, adequate dosing and timing of administration as well as surgery-specific policies, have to be agreed upon by all departments involved. At discharge, the patient's physician shall be informed of analgesics given and those necessary after discharge. Patients shall be informed of possible side effects and symptoms and timely discontinuation of analgesic drugs.

conclusionThe use of nonopioid analgesics as part of a perioperative multimodal concept should be approved and established as an interdisciplinary and interprofessional concept for the adequate treatment of postoperative pain.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnesthesiologyAnalgesicsCritical CareHumansPostoperative PainAnalgesicsAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAcute painMetamizole (Dipyrone)Nonopioid analgesicsNSAIDsParacetamolPatient informationPerioperative pain management

Identifiers

PMID34076782
OpenAlexW3164509164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.