Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34076767›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Patterns of care after cholecystostomy tube placement.

Alex Lois, Erin Fennern, Sara Cook, David Flum, Giana Davidson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS. SURGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, OR ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT? BRAZILIAN COLLEGE OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY POSITION PAPER.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alex LoisDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 502, UW Box 354808, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA. alexlois@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8605-4226
Erin FennernDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 502, UW Box 354808, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Sara CookDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 502, UW Box 354808, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
David FlumDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 502, UW Box 354808, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Giana DavidsonDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 502, UW Box 354808, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Renewal: Gastrointestinal Surgery Outcomes Research FellowshipT32DK070555 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FLUM, DAVID R · 2010 to 2024
$3.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK070555NIDDK NIH HHS T32DK070555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of cholecystostomy (c-tube) in acute cholecystitis (AC) has increased yet there is limited evidence to guide surgical decision-making after placement. As a result, there is variability in the use and timing of cholecystectomy after c-tube. We aimed to describe patient characteristics, outcomes, and biliary-related utilization in those who did and did not have cholecystectomy after c-tube.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study (2007-2017) using the MarketScan® claims database of patients (18-63 years) with at least 3 months of follow-up (or death). ICD-9/10 and CPT codes were used to identify AC, c-tube placement, cholecystectomy and determine Elixhauser comorbidity index.

resultsA total of 2386 patients (47.5% female, mean age 52.5 [SD 9.9] years) with AC underwent c-tube with an 11.2% 90-day mortality. Among survivors, by three months 57% underwent cholecystectomy (mean 34.8 days [95% CI: 33.3-36.3]). Cholecystectomy after c-tube was more common in those with fewer comorbid conditions (mean 2.41 [95% CI: 2.26-2.56] vs 4.56 [95%CI: 4.36-4.76]). Biliary episodes prior to cholecystectomy occurred in 12.5% and were associated with eventual cholecystectomy (HR 1.49 [1.32-1.68]). Biliary-specific hospital and ICU days were similar between groups. Biliary-specific ED visits were more common among patients with cholecystectomy (mean 1.39 [95% CI: 1.29-1.48] vs 0.94 [95% CI: 0.85-1.03]).

conclusionMore than half of patients treated with c-tube underwent cholecystectomy by three months-most within five weeks of AC diagnosis. The high frequency of use and short time to cholecystectomy after c-tube raises questions about potential overuse of c-tube in the initial period. Future work should aim to understand how patient experience and indication for c-tube influence the likelihood and timing of subsequent cholecystectomy.

Indexed as

Cholecystitis, AcuteCholecystostomyCholecystectomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAcute cholecystitisCholecystectomyCholecystostomyOutcomesUtilization

Identifiers

PMID34076767
PMCPMC8636522
OpenAlexW3164993780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.