ReviewTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2021
Scaling up high-throughput phenotyping for abiotic stress selection in the field.
Review in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Stress Tolerance: From Stress Perception to Phytohormonal Crosstalk and Transcriptional Regulation.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- High-throughput phenotyping for climate-resilient forests: integrating multi-sensor fusion and root-shoot dynamics.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- High-throughput plant phenotyping identifies and discriminates biotic and abiotic stresses in tomato.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Phenotyping the hidden half: combining UAV phenotyping and machine learning to predict barley root traits in the field.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Article
- Integration of crop modeling and sensing into molecular breeding for nutritional quality and stress tolerance.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- Advances in Functional Genomics for Exploring Abiotic Stress Tolerance Mechanisms in Cereals.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Breeding perspectives on tackling trait genome-to-phenome (G2P) dimensionality using ensemble-based genomic prediction.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- High-throughput phenotyping in maize and soybean genotypes using vegetation indices and computational intelligence.Plant methods · 2024Article
- Visualizing Plant Responses: Novel Insights Possible Through Affordable Imaging Techniques in the Greenhouse.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Prediction accuracy and repeatability of UAV based biomass estimation in wheat variety trials as affected by variable type, modelling strategy and sampling location.Plant methods · 2024Article
- From Images to Loci: Applying 3D Deep Learning to Enable Multivariate and Multitemporal Digital Phenotyping and Mapping the Genetics Underlying Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Wheat.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Editorial: IPPS 2022 - plant phenotyping for a sustainable future.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- An Integrated Multi-Omics and Artificial Intelligence Framework for Advance Plant Phenotyping in Horticulture.Biology · 2023Review
- Breeding crops for drought-affected environments and improved climate resilience.The Plant cell · 2023Review
- Remote sensing for field pea yield estimation: A study of multi-scale data fusion approaches in phenomics.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Satellite imagery for high-throughput phenotyping in breeding plots.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Frost Damage Index: The Antipode of Growing Degree Days.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
- Capturing crop adaptation to abiotic stress using image-based technologies.Open biology · 2022Review
- In-Field Wheat Reflectance: How to Reach the Organ Scale?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
key messageHigh-throughput phenotyping (HTP) is in its infancy for deployment in large-scale breeding programmes. With the ability to measure correlated traits associated with physiological ideotypes, in-field phenotyping methods are available for screening of abiotic stress responses. As cropping environments become more hostile and unpredictable due to the effects of climate change, the need to characterise variability across spatial and temporal scales will become increasingly important. The sensor technologies that have enabled HTP from macroscopic through to satellite sensors may also be utilised here to complement spatial characterisation using envirotyping, which can improve estimations of genotypic performance across environments by better accounting for variation at the plot, trial and inter-trial levels. Climate change is leading to increased variation at all physical and temporal scales in the cropping environment. Maintaining yield stability under circumstances with greater levels of abiotic stress while capitalising upon yield potential in good years, requires approaches to plant breeding that target the physiological limitations to crop performance in specific environments. This requires dynamic modelling of conditions within target populations of environments, GxExM predictions, clustering of environments so breeding trajectories can be defined, and the development of screens that enable selection for genetic gain to occur. High-throughput phenotyping (HTP), combined with related technologies used for envirotyping, can help to address these challenges. Non-destructive analysis of the morphological, biochemical and physiological qualities of plant canopies using HTP has great potential to complement whole-genome selection, which is becoming increasingly common in breeding programmes. A range of novel analytic techniques, such as machine learning and deep learning, combined with a widening range of sensors, allow rapid assessment of large breeding populations that are repeatable and objective. Secondary traits underlying radiation use efficiency and water use efficiency can be screened with HTP for selection at the early stages of a breeding programme. HTP and envirotyping technologies can also characterise spatial variability at trial and within-plot levels, which can be used to correct for spatial variations that confound measurements of genotypic values. This review explores HTP for abiotic stress selection through a physiological trait lens and additionally investigates the use of envirotyping and EC to characterise spatial variability at all physical scales in METs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34076731What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.