Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34076721›Full record

SynthesisAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Practical and clinical applications of pancreatic magnetic resonance elastography: a systematic review.

Emily Steinkohl, Davide Bertoli, Tine Maria Hansen, Søren Schou Olesen, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Jens Brøndum Frøkjær

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily SteinkohlMech-Sense, Department of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, PO. Box 365, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6543-2275
Davide BertoliMech-Sense, Department of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, PO. Box 365, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1598-9053
Tine Maria HansenMech-Sense, Department of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, PO. Box 365, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6160-5519
Søren Schou OlesenCentre for Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Mølleparkvej 4, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3916-3168
Asbjørn Mohr DrewesCentre for Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Mølleparkvej 4, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7465-964X
Jens Brøndum FrøkjærMech-Sense, Department of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, PO. Box 365, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark. jebf@rn.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8722-0070
Aalborg University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a non-invasive technique suitable for assessing mechanical properties of tissues, i.e., stiffness. MRE of the pancreas is relatively new, but recently an increasing number of studies have successfully assessed pancreas diseases with MRE aiming to differentiate healthy from pathological pancreatic tissue with or without fibrosis. This review will systematically describe the practical and clinical applications of pancreatic MRE. We conducted a systematic literature search with a pre-specified search strategy using PubMed and Embase according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. English peer-reviewed articles applying MRE of the pancreas were included. Two independent reviewers assessed the studies. The literature search yielded 14 studies. The pancreatic stiffness for healthy volunteers ranged from 1.11. to 1.21 kPa at a driver frequency of 40 Hz. In benign tumors, the stiffness values were slightly higher or sometimes even lower (range 0.78 to 2.00 kPa), compared to the healthy pancreas parenchyma whereas, in malignant tumors, the stiffness values tended to be higher (1.42 to 6.06 kPa). The pancreatic stiffness was increased in both acute (median: 1.99 kPa) and chronic pancreatitis (> 1.50 kPa). MRE is a promising technique for detecting and quantifying pancreatic stiffness. It is related to fibrosis and seems to be useful in assessing treatment response and clinical follow-up of pancreatic diseases. However, most of the described practical settings were characterized by a lack of uniformity and inconsistency in reporting standards across studies. Harmonization between centers is necessary to achieve more consensus and optimization of pancreatic MRE protocols.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesPancreatic DiseasesHealthy VolunteersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPancreasElastographyFibrosisMagnetic resonance imagingPancreasStiffness

Identifiers

PMID34076721
OpenAlexW3164854959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.