Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34076593›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2021

FragMAXapp: crystallographic fragment-screening data-analysis and project-management system.

Gustavo M A Lima, Elmir Jagudin, Vladimir O Talibov, Laila S Benz, Costantino Marullo, Tatjana Barthel, Jan Wollenhaupt, Manfred S Weiss, Uwe Mueller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Structural Biology for Target Identification and Validation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Crystallographic fragment screen of the c-di-AMP-synthesizing enzyme CdaA from Bacillus subtilis.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fast fragment- and compound-screening pipeline at the Swiss Light Source.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gustavo M A LimaBioMAX, MAX IV Laboratory, Fotongatan 2, 224 84 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0011-5559
Elmir JagudinBioMAX, MAX IV Laboratory, Fotongatan 2, 224 84 Lund, Sweden.
Vladimir O TalibovBioMAX, MAX IV Laboratory, Fotongatan 2, 224 84 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1135-2744
Laila S BenzInstitut für Chemie und Biochemie, Freie Universität Berlin, Thielallee 63, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6369-8707
Costantino MarulloBioMAX, MAX IV Laboratory, Fotongatan 2, 224 84 Lund, Sweden.
Tatjana BarthelMacromolecular Crystallography, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, Albert-Einstein-Strasse 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8747-3112
Jan WollenhauptMacromolecular Crystallography, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, Albert-Einstein-Strasse 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3418-5213
Manfred S WeissMacromolecular Crystallography, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, Albert-Einstein-Strasse 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2362-7047
Uwe MuellerMacromolecular Crystallography, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, Albert-Einstein-Strasse 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7139-0718

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet 2018-05973Vetenskapsrådet 2018-06454VINNOVA 2019-02567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crystallographic fragment screening (CFS) has become one of the major techniques for screening compounds in the early stages of drug-discovery projects. Following the advances in automation and throughput at modern macromolecular crystallography beamlines, the bottleneck for CFS has shifted from collecting data to organizing and handling the analysis of such projects. The complexity that emerges from the use of multiple methods for processing and refinement and to search for ligands requires an equally sophisticated solution to summarize the output, allowing researchers to focus on the scientific questions instead of on software technicalities. FragMAXapp is the fragment-screening project-management tool designed to handle CFS projects at MAX IV Laboratory. It benefits from the powerful computing infrastructure of large-scale facilities and, as a web application, it is accessible from everywhere.

Indexed as

LigandsModels, MolecularSoftwareData AnalysisDrug DiscoveryMacromolecular SubstancesProteinsLigandsMacromolecular SubstancesProteinsdrug discoveryfragment-based lead discoveryfragment screeninghigh-throughput data analysisprotein crystallography

Identifiers

PMID34076593
PMCPMC8171072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.