ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2021
The missing link: covalent linkages in structural models.
Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- 23S rRNA modifications stimulate catalytic activity and prevent the formation of alternative structures.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Identification of novel and potent inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease from DNA-encoded chemical libraries.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Outcomes of the EMDataResource cryo-EM Ligand Modeling Challenge.Nature methods · 2024Article
- A database overview of metal-coordination distances in metalloproteins.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2024Article
- Neutron crystallographic refinement with REFMAC5 from the CCP4 suite.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023Article
- The CCP4 suite: integrative software for macromolecular crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023Article
- GEMMI and Servalcat restrain REFMAC5.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023Article
- Updated restraint dictionaries for carbohydrates in the pyranose form.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022Article
- Ten things I `hate' about refinement.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021Article
- Cryo-EM single-particle structure refinement and map calculation using Servalcat.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021Article
- New restraints and validation approaches for nucleic acid structures in PDB-REDO.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021Article
- Modelling covalent linkages in CCP4.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Covalent linkages between constituent blocks of macromolecules and ligands have been subject to inconsistent treatment during the model-building, refinement and deposition process. This may stem from a number of sources, including difficulties with initially detecting the covalent linkage, identifying the correct chemistry, obtaining an appropriate restraint dictionary and ensuring its correct application. The analysis presented herein assesses the extent of problems involving covalent linkages in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Not only will this facilitate the remediation of existing models, but also, more importantly, it will inform and thus improve the quality of future linkages. By considering linkages of known type in the CCP4 Monomer Library (CCP4-ML), failure to model a covalent linkage is identified to result in inaccurate (systematically longer) interatomic distances. Scanning the PDB for proximal atom pairs that do not have a corresponding type in the CCP4-ML reveals a large number of commonly occurring types of unannotated potential linkages; in general, these may or may not be covalently linked. Manual consideration of the most commonly occurring cases identifies a number of genuine classes of covalent linkages. The recent expansion of the CCP4-ML is discussed, which has involved the addition of over 16 000 and the replacement of over 11 000 component dictionaries using AceDRG. As part of this effort, the CCP4-ML has also been extended using AceDRG link dictionaries for the aforementioned linkage types identified in this analysis. This will facilitate the identification of such linkage types in future modelling efforts, whilst concurrently easing the process involved in their application. The need for a universal standard for maintaining link records corresponding to covalent linkages, and references to the associated dictionaries used during modelling and refinement, following deposition to the PDB is emphasized. The importance of correctly modelling covalent linkages is demonstrated using a case study, which involves the covalent linkage of an inhibitor to the main protease in various viral species, including SARS-CoV-2. This example demonstrates the importance of properly modelling covalent linkages using a comprehensive restraint dictionary, as opposed to just using a single interatomic distance restraint or failing to model the covalent linkage at all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.