Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34076372›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

Predicting anxiety in cancer survivors presenting to primary care - A machine learning approach accounting for physical comorbidity.

Markus W Haun, Laura Simon, Halina Sklenarova, Verena Zimmermann-Schlegel, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Mechthild Hartmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Markus W HaunDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1851-3747
Laura SimonClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Halina SklenarovaForensic Psychiatric Clinic, Ansbach District Hospital, Ansbach, Germany.
Verena Zimmermann-SchlegelDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hans-Christoph FriederichDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mechthild HartmannDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEAnsbach University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Gesundheit NKP-332-048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to explore predictors for anxiety as the most common form of psychological distress in cancer survivors while accounting for physical comorbidity.

methodsWe conducted a secondary data analysis of a large study within the German National Cancer Plan which enrolled primary care cancer survivors diagnosed with colon, prostatic, or breast cancer. We selected candidate predictors based on a systematic MEDLINE search. Using supervised machine learning, we developed a prediction model for anxiety by splitting the data into a 70% training set and a 30% test set and further split the training set into 10-folds for cross-validating the hyperparameter tuning step during model selection. We fit six different regression models, selected the model that maximized the root mean square error (RMSE) and fit the selected model to the entire training set. Finally, we evaluated the model performance on the holdout test set.

resultsIn total, data from 496 cancer survivors were analyzed. The LASSO model (α = 1.0) with weakly penalized model complexity (λ = 0.015) slightly outperformed all other models (RMSE = 0.370). Physical symptoms, namely, fatigue/weakness (β = 0.18), insomnia (β = 0.12), and pain (β = 0.04), were the most important predictors, while the degree of physical comorbidity was negligible.

conclusionsPrediction of clinically significant anxiety in cancer survivors using readily available predictors is feasible. The findings highlight the need for considering cancer survivors' physical functioning regardless of the degree of comorbidity when assessing their psychological well-being. The generalizability of the model to other populations should be investigated in future external validations.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareSupervised Machine LearningAgedAnxietyBreast NeoplasmsCancer PainCancer SurvivorsColonic NeoplasmsComorbidityFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle WeaknessPredictive Value of Testsanxietycancer survivorscomorbidityhealth services researchmachine learningpredictionprimary care

Identifiers

PMID34076372
PMCPMC8290227
OpenAlexW3165375028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.