ArticleEuropean journal of clinical investigation2021
Ga-68 EDTA aerosols in evaluation of inhaled-particle deposition and clearance of obstructive pulmonary diseases: A pilot prospective study compared with Galligas.
Article in European journal of clinical investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06891274 (Study on the Lung Aerosol Deposition of Ultrasonic Rock Salt Inhalation Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study on the Lung Aerosol Deposition of Ultrasonic Rock Salt Inhalation Therapy
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ga-68 EDTA aerosols in evaluation of inhaled-particle deposition and clearance of obstructive pulmonary diseases: A pilot prospective study compared with Galligas.European journal of clinical investigation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose68-gallium (Ga-68) ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) aerosols and Galligas were compared in evaluation of inhaled-particle deposition and clearance in volunteers with or without obstructive pulmonary diseases.
methodsNonsmoking healthy volunteers, healthy smokers, asthma patients and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were recruited to undergo the dynamic lung ventilation positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) scans within two consecutive days. The inhaled particles were Ga-68-labelled carbon nanoparticles (Galligas, 30-60 nm in size) and Ga-68-labelled EDTA aerosols (1-2 μm in size), respectively. The volunteers' lung function parameters were measured for comparison.
resultsCentral deposition and inhomogeneity of both tracers were negatively correlated with lung function parameters, including the ratio of forced expiratory volume at 1 second to forced vital capacity (FEV
conclusionsBoth Galligas and Ga-68 EDTA aerosols can be used for PET/CT lung ventilation scan. However, Ga-68 EDTA aerosols showed more advantages in diagnosis and evaluation of obstructive airway diseases by revealing the inhaled-particle deposition and clearance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.