Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34076236›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

noisyR: enhancing biological signal in sequencing datasets by characterizing random technical noise.

Ilias Moutsopoulos, Lukas Maischak, Elze Lauzikaite, Sergio A Vasquez Urbina, Eleanor C Williams, Hajk-Georg Drost, Irina I Mohorianu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Human pancreatic islet microRNAs implicated in diabetes and related traits by large-scale genetic analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ilias MoutsopoulosWellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AW, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4584-7849
Lukas MaischakComputational Biology Group, Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Max-Planck Ring 1, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Elze LauzikaiteWellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AW, UK.
Sergio A Vasquez UrbinaComputational Biology Group, Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Max-Planck Ring 1, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Eleanor C WilliamsWellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AW, UK.
Hajk-Georg DrostComputational Biology Group, Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Max-Planck Ring 1, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1567-306X
Irina I MohorianuWellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AW, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4863-761X

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17230Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput sequencing enables an unprecedented resolution in transcript quantification, at the cost of magnifying the impact of technical noise. The consistent reduction of random background noise to capture functionally meaningful biological signals is still challenging. Intrinsic sequencing variability introducing low-level expression variations can obscure patterns in downstream analyses. We introduce noisyR, a comprehensive noise filter to assess the variation in signal distribution and achieve an optimal information-consistency across replicates and samples; this selection also facilitates meaningful pattern recognition outside the background-noise range. noisyR is applicable to count matrices and sequencing data; it outputs sample-specific signal/noise thresholds and filtered expression matrices. We exemplify the effects of minimizing technical noise on several datasets, across various sequencing assays: coding, non-coding RNAs and interactions, at bulk and single-cell level. An immediate consequence of filtering out noise is the convergence of predictions (differential-expression calls, enrichment analyses and inference of gene regulatory networks) across different approaches.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsArabidopsisComputational BiologyComputer SimulationGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiceMicroRNAsReproducibility of ResultsRNA, MessengerRNA-SeqSingle-Cell AnalysisMicroRNAsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID34076236
PMCPMC8373073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.