Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34075789›Full record

ArticleHERD2021

Telemedicine Implementation in COVID-19 ICU: Balancing Physical and Virtual Forms of Visibility.

Nirit Putievsky Pilosof, Michael Barrett, Eivor Oborn, Galia Barkai, Itai M Pessach, Eyal Zimlichman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HERD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The impact of hospital command centre on patient flow and data quality: findings from the UK National Health Service.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Postsurgical Remote Patient Monitoring Outcomes and Perceptions: A Mixed-Methods Assessment.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nirit Putievsky PilosofCambridge Digital Innovation-CJBS & Hughes Hall, 2152University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2790-0792
Michael BarrettCambridge Judge Business School (CJBS), 2152University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Eivor ObornWarwick Business School, University of Warwick, United Kingdom.
Galia BarkaiSheba BEYOND, 26744Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Itai M Pessach26744Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Eyal Zimlichman26744Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis case study examines the implementation of inpatient telemedicine in COVID-19 intensive care units (ICUs) and explores the impact of shifting forms of visibility on the management of the unit, staff collaboration, and patient care.

backgroundThe COVID-19 crisis drove healthcare institutions to rapidly develop new models of care based on integrating digital technologies for remote care with transformations in the hospital-built environment. The Sheba Medical Center in Israel created COVID-19 ICUs in an underground structure with an open-ward layout and telemedicine control rooms to remotely supervise, communicate, and support the operations in the contaminated zones. One unit had a physical visual connection between the control room and the contaminated zone through a window, while the other had only a virtual connection with digital technologies.

methodsThe findings are based on semistructured interviews with Sheba medical staff, telemedicine companies, and the architectural design team and observations at the COVID-19 units during March-August 2020.

resultsThe case study illustrates the implications of virtual and physical visibility on the management of the unit, staff collaboration, and patient care. It demonstrates the correlations between patterns of visibility and the users' sense of control, orientation in space, teamwork, safety, quality of care, and well-being.

conclusionsThe case study demonstrates the limitations of current telemedicine technologies that were not designed for inpatient care to account for the spatial perception of the unit and the dynamic use of the space. It presents the potential of a hybrid model that balances virtual and physical forms of visibility and suggests directions for future research and development of inpatient telemedicine.

Indexed as

COVID-19Facility Design and ConstructionHumansInfection ControlIntensive Care UnitsIsraelOrganizational Case StudiesPatient IsolationSARS-CoV-2Telemedicinecontrol roomCOVID-19healthcare designinpatient telemedicinemodel of carevisibility

Identifiers

PMID34075789
PMCPMC8212392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.