Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34075572›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2021

Signal Detection and Methodological Limitations in a Real-World Registry: Learnings from the Evaluation of Long-Term Safety Analyses in PSOLAR.

Robert Bissonnette, Alice B Gottlieb, Richard G Langley, Craig L Leonardi, Kim A Papp, David M Pariser, Jonathan Uy, Kim Parnell Lafferty, Wayne Langholff, Steven Fakharzadeh and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interpreting Safety Analyses in Psoriasis Clinical Trials.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert BissonnetteInnovaderm Research, Inc., 3530 St-Laurent Blvd, Suite 300, Montreal, QC, H2X 2V1, Canada. rbissonnette@innovaderm.ca.
Alice B GottliebIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Richard G LangleyDalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Craig L LeonardiSaint Louis University Medical School, St Louis, MO, USA.
Kim A PappK. Papp Clinical Research and Probity Research Inc., Waterloo, ON, Canada.
David M PariserEastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Jonathan UyJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA.
Kim Parnell LaffertyJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA.
Wayne LangholffJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, USA.
Steven FakharzadehJanssen Global Services, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA.
Jesse A Berlin, Johnson & Johnson Epidemiology, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Emily S BrouwerJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, USA.
Andrew J GreenspanJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA.
Bruce E StroberYale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Janssen (United States) · USJanssen Scientific Affairs (United States)Dalhousie University · CAEastern Virginia Medical School · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USInnovaderm (Canada) · CAJohnson & Johnson (United States) · USProbity Medical Research · CASaint Louis University · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPsoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR) was designed in 2007 as the first disease-based registry for patients with psoriasis.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to discuss methodological limitations and post hoc analyses in long-term safety registries using learnings from analyses of a potential safety risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in PSOLAR.

methodsPSOLAR is an international observational study of over 12,000 psoriasis patients that was conducted to meet postmarketing safety commitments for infliximab and ustekinumab. A recent annual review of registry data indicated a potential MACE risk for ustekinumab vs. non-biologics based on prespecified COX model regression analyses, which yielded an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.533 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.103-2.131). Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive review of key statistical methodology and implemented post hoc analytical methods to address specific limitations.

resultsThe following limiting factors were identified: (1) inclusion of both prevalent and incident (new) users of biologics; (2) unanticipated imbalances in patient characteristics between treatment cohorts at baseline; (3) limited availability of relevant clinical data after enrollment; and (4) divergence of characteristics associated with outcomes among comparator groups over time. The analysis was modified to include only incident users, propensity scores were used to weight HRs, and adalimumab was deemed a more clinically appropriate comparator. The revised HR was 0.820 (95% CI 0.532-1.265), indicating no meaningful increase in MACE risk for ustekinumab.

conclusionOur results, which do not support a causal association between ustekinumab exposure and MACE risk, underscore the need for ongoing assessment of analytical methods in long-term observational studies.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsPsoriasisAdalimumabHumansInfliximabObservational Studies as TopicRegistriesUstekinumabAdalimumabBiological ProductsInfliximabUstekinumab

Identifiers

PMID34075572
PMCPMC8184557
OpenAlexW3165355211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.