ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021
Standard set of patient-reported outcomes for personality disorder.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementation and Outcomes of Peer Support Workers in Services for People With Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.Personality and mental health · 2026Pooled it
- Crisis and acute mental health care for people who have been given a diagnosis of a 'personality disorder': a systematic review.BMC psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Which psychotherapy is most effective and acceptable in the treatment of adults with a (sub)clinical borderline personality disorder? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Psychological medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of Self-Report and Structured Clinical Interview Scores for the Assessment of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale.Personality and mental health · 2026Article
- Possible drivers of self-harm severity - relative contributions of post-traumatic stress and levels of personality functioning - results from the Extreme Challenges project.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Facilitating clinical application of a dimensional model for personality disorders across the entire adult lifespan: thresholds for dysfunction and a multi-method approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The Devil Is in the Tail: Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA) test percentiles and normalized T-scores.Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment · 2026Article
- Article
- Psychosocial functioning in personality disorders.Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation · 2025Review
- Influences on and prevention of self-harm behavior among the most at-risk adolescents: study protocol for the SH-MARA prospective longitudinal cohort study.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- An Investigation of Longitudinal Measurement Invariance and Item Response Theory Analysis of the LPFS-BF 2.0 in a Large Clinical Norwegian Sample.Personality and mental health · 2025Article
- Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118): Dutch Norms, T-scores, and Percentile Rank Scores.Personality and mental health · 2025Article
- Level of personality functioning scale-brief form 2.0: validity and reliability of the Chinese version.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Validating the Italian version of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0): internal structure, temporal stability and construct validity.Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation · 2025Article
- Level of personality functioning and maladaptive personality traits in relation to depression and anxiety symptoms in middle and older adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- How Do Personality Dysfunction and Maladaptive Personality Traits Predict Time to Premature Discontinuation of Pharmacological Treatment of ADHD?Journal of attention disorders · 2025Article
- Severity Benchmarks for the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0) in Polish Adults.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Personality disorders: the impact of severity on societal costs.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025Article
- Standardized effect sizes are far from "Standardized": A primer and empirical illustration in depression psychotherapy meta-analyses.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
- Practical implications of ICD-11 personality disorder classifications.BMC psychiatry · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of the article is to present standard set of outcomes for people with personality disorder (PD), in order to facilitate patient outcome measurement worldwide.
methodsThe International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) gathered a multidisciplinary international working group, consisting of 16 experts, including clinicians, nurses, psychologists, methodologists and patient representatives, to develop a standard set of outcome measures for people with PD. The Delphi method was used to reach consensus on the scope of the set, outcome domains, outcome measures, case-mix variables and time points for measuring outcomes in service users. For each phase, a project team prepared materials based on systematic literature reviews and consultations with experts.
resultsThe working group decided to include PD, as defined by International Classification of Diseases 11th revision (ICD-11). Eleven core outcomes and three optional outcomes across four health domains (mental health, behaviour, functioning and recovery) were defined as those relevant for people with PD. Validated measures for the selected outcomes were selected, some covering more than one outcome. Case-mix variables were aligned to other ICHOM mental health standard sets and consisted of demographic factors and those related to the treatment that people received. The group recommended that most outcomes are measured at baseline and annually.
conclusionThe international minimum standard set of outcomes has the potential to improve clinical decision making through systematic measurement and comparability. This will be key in improving the standard of health care for people with PD across the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.