Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34075519›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2021

Conditional Non-parametric Bootstrap for Non-linear Mixed Effect Models.

Emmanuelle Comets, Christelle Rodrigues, Vincent Jullien, Moreno Ursino

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emmanuelle CometsUniversit́e de Paris, INSERM IAME; INSERM, CIC 1414; Rennes-1 University, France 16 rue Henri Huchard, 75018, Paris, France. emmanuelle.comets@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9150-9886
Christelle RodriguesINSERM U1129, Paris Descartes University, CEA, Paris, France.
Vincent JullienUF Pharmacologie, GH Paris Seine Saint-Denis, Universit́e Paris, 13, Paris, France.
Moreno UrsinoUnit of Clinical Epidemiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, CHU Robert Debré, Université de Paris, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Inserm U1123 and CIC-EC 1426, Paris, F-75019, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNon-linear mixed effect models are widely used and increasingly integrated into decision-making processes. Propagating uncertainty is an important element of this process, and while standard errors (SE) on pa- rameters are most often computed using asymptotic approaches, alternative methods such as the bootstrap are also available. In this article, we propose a modified residual parametric bootstrap taking into account the different levels of variability involved in these models.

methodsThe proposed approach uses samples from the individual conditional distribution, and was implemented in R using the saemix algorithm. We performed a simulation study to assess its performance in different scenarios, comparing it to the asymptotic approximation and to standard bootstraps in terms of coverage, also looking at bias in the parameters and their SE.

resultsSimulations with an Emax model with different designs and sigmoidicity factors showed a similar coverage rate to the parametric bootstrap, while requiring less hypotheses. Bootstrap improved coverage in several scenarios compared to the asymptotic method especially for the variance param-eters. However, all bootstraps were sensitive to estimation bias in the original datasets.

conclusionsThe conditional bootstrap provided better coverage rate than the traditional residual bootstrap, while preserving the structure of the data generating process.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalNonlinear DynamicsHumansStatistics, Nonparametricbootstrapconditional distributionnon-linear mixed effect modelsuncertainty of parameter estimates

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.