Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34075492›Full record

ArticleOdontology2021

Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation.

Davide Farronato, Pietro Mario Pasini, Veronica Campana, Diego Lops, Lorenzo Azzi, Mattia Manfredini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Davide FarronatoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Pietro Mario PasiniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Veronica CampanaPrivate Practitioner, Varese, Italy. dr.campanaveronica@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1676-3419
Diego LopsDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.
Lorenzo AzziDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Oral Pathology, Dental Clinic, University of Insubria, ASST Dei Sette Laghi, 21100, Varese, Italy.
Mattia ManfrediniPrivate Practitioner, Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impression accuracy is fundamental to achieve a passive fit between implants and the superstructure. Three transfer types were tested to evaluate the differences in impression accuracy and their efficiency in case of different implant angles. A master model with four implant analogues placed at 0°, 15° and 35° was used. 27 impressions were taken with three different types of impression coping: closed tray technique coping (CT), open tray technique coping (COT) and telescopic open tray coping (TOT). The impressions were poured. Analogues were matched with scan bodies to be scanned and exported in STL. An implant bar was designed from each STL and another one from the master model. A comparison between these bars was obtained. Linear and angular measurements for every type of coping were calculated for different angulations. The collected data were analyzed with ANOVA test (95% of confidence). Student's t test showed a significative discrepancy (p ≤ 0.001) on linear and angular measurements on Δx, Δy, Δz with different transfer types as well as diverse implant positioning angles (p ≤ 0.001). Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the coping type and the implants divergence may be significant parameters influencing the impression accuracy.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsDental Impression TechniqueDental Impression MaterialsDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedHumansModels, DentalDental ImplantsDental Impression MaterialsDental implantsImplant angulationImplant impression techniqueImpression accuracyImpression coping

Identifiers

PMID34075492
PMCPMC8387271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.