Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34075476›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Maternal knowledge explains screen time differences 2 and 3.5 years post-intervention in INFANT.

Christine Delisle Nyström, Gavin Abbott, Adrian J Cameron, Karen J Campbell, Marie Löf, Jo Salmon, Kylie D Hesketh

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christine Delisle NyströmDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Neo, 141 83, Huddinge, Sweden. christine.delisle.nystrom@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3496-8266
Gavin AbbottInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Geelong, 3125, Australia.
Adrian J CameronGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, 3125, Australia.
Karen J CampbellInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Geelong, 3125, Australia.
Marie LöfDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Neo, 141 83, Huddinge, Sweden.
Jo SalmonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Geelong, 3125, Australia.
Kylie D HeskethInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Geelong, 3125, Australia.
Deakin University · AULinköping University · SE

Funding

Australian Research Council FT130100637Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd 2018-01137National Health and Medical Research Council 1101675National Health and Medical Research Council 425801 & 1008879National Health and Medical Research Council APP1152968National Health and Medical Research Council APP 1176885National Heart Foundation of Australia 100370National Heart Foundation of Australia 36357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Very few early childhood interventions have observed sustained effects regarding television viewing and none have examined the mechanisms behind sustained intervention effects at long-term follow-ups. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate potential mechanisms relating to the maintained intervention effect on television viewing at two long-term follow-ups in the Melbourne Infant Feeding Activity and Nutrition Trial (INFANT). INFANT was a cluster-randomised controlled trial. At the 2- and 3.5-year follow-ups, a total of 262 infant/mother pairs had complete information. Television viewing was assessed via a questionnaire at both follow-ups and six potential mediators were measured post-intervention (i.e. 15 months after baseline). Causal mediation analysis was conducted. At the 2- and 3.5-year follow-ups, the positive impacts of INFANT on maternal television viewing knowledge were maintained (B = 0.34 units; 95% confidence interval (CI

Indexed as

Screen TimeTelevisionChild, PreschoolDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansInfantMothersParentsKnowledgeLong-term follow-upPaediatrics, Screen time

Identifiers

PMID34075476
PMCPMC8502736
OpenAlexW3165119521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.