Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34075471›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2022

A positive response of ginger root zone and rhizome development to suitable sowing depth.

Yao Lv, Yanyan Li, Xiaohui Liu, Kun Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yao LvCollege of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.
Yanyan LiCollege of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.
Xiaohui LiuSchool of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Kun XuCollege of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China. xukun@sdau.edu.cn.
Shandong Agricultural University · CNTsinghua University · CN

Funding

China Agriculture Research System CARS-24-A-09National Natural Science Foundation of China 31972399Taishan Industrial Experts Programme, China tscy20190105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sowing depth significantly affects ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) yields, and sowing depth can affect rhizosphere community structure through root exudates. However, the relationship between the reaction process in root zone and ginger rhizome development is unclear. In this study, we investigated the rhizome and root development and rhizosphere environment at different sowing depths (2 cm (SD2), 5 cm (SD5), and 10 cm (SD10)). It was found that SD10 significantly increased ginger yield, which is related to the development of vascular bundles and the expression of aquaporin. PLS-PM analysis found that root length, root absorption capacity, and soil enzymes have the strongest correlation with yield, while root diameter is negatively correlated with yield. Under SD10, the increase of auxin and ethylene content together with the expression of ARF7, LBD16, and PIN1 promoted the development of lateral roots. In addition, SD10 increased the secretion of root organic acids, amino acids, and carbohydrates, which in turn promoted the development of rhizosphere bacteria. The promotion of SD10 on nitrogen cycle and nitrogen fixation ability in turn promoted the development of ginger.

Indexed as

Zingiber officinalePlant ExtractsRhizomeRhizosphereSoilginger extractPlant ExtractsSoilEndogenous hormonesRhizosphere bacteriaRoot architectureRoot exudatesSowing depth

Identifiers

PMID34075471
OpenAlexW3165761003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.