Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34075432›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2022

A1- and A2 beta-casein on health-related outcomes: a scoping review of animal studies.

Daniela Kuellenberg de Gaudry, Szimonetta Lohner, Karin Bischoff, Christine Schmucker, Simone Hoerrlein, Christine Roeger, Lukas Schwingshackl, Joerg J Meerpohl

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A2 milk consumption and its health benefits: an update.Food science and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Frequency of β-Casein Gene Polymorphisms in Jersey Cows in Western Japan.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniela Kuellenberg de GaudryInstitute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 153, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4289-5853
Szimonetta LohnerCochrane Hungary, Clinical Center, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pecs, Hungary.
Karin BischoffInstitute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 153, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.
Christine SchmuckerInstitute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 153, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.
Simone HoerrleinCompetence Center for Nutrition, Bavarian State Ministry for Food, Agriculture and Forestry, Freising, Germany.
Christine RoegerCompetence Center for Nutrition, Bavarian State Ministry for Food, Agriculture and Forestry, Freising, Germany.
Lukas SchwingshacklInstitute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 153, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.
Joerg J MeerpohlInstitute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 153, 79110, Freiburg, Germany. meerpohl@cochrane.com.
University of Freiburg · DEBavarian State Research Center for Agriculture · DEUniversity of Pecs · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFood-derived bioactive peptides may influence important physiological functions. An important example is beta-casomorphins, which are opioid peptides derived from A1 beta-casein in bovine milk and have been associated to be risk factors for non-communicable diseases in humans. A1 and A2 beta-casein are different with respect to the release of bioactive peptides, in particular BCM-7. However, evidence from human studies is limited and could be complemented with evidence derived from animal studies. We conducted a scoping review to identify animal studies investigating the effects of A1 beta-casein or BCM-7 compared to A2 beta-casein or any other intervention on health-related outcomes.

methodsWe systematically searched for relevant studies in two electronic databases (Medline, Embase; last search performed March 2020). Two reviewers independently undertook study selection and data extraction of included references. Results were summarized tabularly and narratively.

resultsWe included 42 studies investigating various animal models, including rats, mice, rabbits, and dogs. Six studies investigated health-related outcomes of A1- vs. A2 milk, while most studies (n = 36) reported on physiological properties (e.g., analgesic effect) of BCM-7 as an opioid peptide. Included studies were extremely heterogeneous in terms of the study population, type of intervention and dose, and type of outcome measures.

conclusionsOnly a few studies comparing the effects of A1- and A2 milk were identified. More studies addressing this research question in animal models are needed to provide essential information to inform research gaps. Results from future studies could eventually complement research for humans, particularly when the body of evidence remains uncertain as is the case in the A1- and A2 milk debate.

Indexed as

CaseinsMilkAnimalsDogsHumansMicePeptidesRabbitsRatsCaseinsPeptidesA1 beta-caseinA1-milkA2-milkAnimal studiesBeta-casein

Identifiers

PMID34075432
PMCPMC8783860
OpenAlexW3165299172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.