ArticleBlood2021
Machine learning integrates genomic signatures for subclassification beyond primary and secondary acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Blood, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed.
- ELN vs. IPSS-M in MDS/AML: Which Prognostic System Should Guide Clinical Decision-Making?Cancers · 2026Review
- Putting the I in AML: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cells · 2026Review
- Validation of ICC hierarchical classification in secondary AML.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Mechanistic learning to predict and understand minimal residual disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Treatment-specific prognostic performance of ELN 2022, ELN 2024, and Beat AML 2024: a real-world AML validation study.Blood neoplasia · 2026Article
- Molecular Pathology, Artificial Intelligence, and New Technologies in Hematologic Diagnostics: Translational Opportunities and Practical Considerations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Central Nervous System Involvement in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: From Pathophysiology to Neuroradiologic Features and the Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in laboratory hematology: Advances, challenges, and prospects.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- Promises and challenges of artificial intelligence in haematological diagnostics.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
- Article
- A clinico-genomic prognostic model for primary myelodysplastic neoplasm in Asia.Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Age-Stratified Impact ofCancers · 2025Article
- A practice-oriented genome-profiling study for acute myeloid leukemia using the novel HANDLE system: HM-screen-JAPAN02.International journal of hematology · 2025Article
- Article
- A novel perspective on survival prediction for AML patients: Integration of machine learning in SEER database applications.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Precision Medicine in Myeloid Neoplasia: Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- A Simple Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Model for Predicting pICPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Can molecular patterns help to classify overlapping entities in myeloid neoplasms?Histopathology · 2025Review
- Cellular hierarchy for understanding heterogeneity of acute myeloid leukaemia with t(8;21)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1.Clinical & translational immunology · 2025Article
- Research advances in the adjunctive diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although genomic alterations drive the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), traditional classifications are largely based on morphology, and prototypic genetic founder lesions define only a small proportion of AML patients. The historical subdivision of primary/de novo AML and secondary AML has shown to variably correlate with genetic patterns. The combinatorial complexity and heterogeneity of AML genomic architecture may have thus far precluded genomic-based subclassification to identify distinct molecularly defined subtypes more reflective of shared pathogenesis. We integrated cytogenetic and gene sequencing data from a multicenter cohort of 6788 AML patients that were analyzed using standard and machine learning methods to generate a novel AML molecular subclassification with biologic correlates corresponding to underlying pathogenesis. Standard supervised analyses resulted in modest cross-validation accuracy when attempting to use molecular patterns to predict traditional pathomorphologic AML classifications. We performed unsupervised analysis by applying the Bayesian latent class method that identified 4 unique genomic clusters of distinct prognoses. Invariant genomic features driving each cluster were extracted and resulted in 97% cross-validation accuracy when used for genomic subclassification. Subclasses of AML defined by molecular signatures overlapped current pathomorphologic and clinically defined AML subtypes. We internally and externally validated our results and share an open-access molecular classification scheme for AML patients. Although the heterogeneity inherent in the genomic changes across nearly 7000 AML patients was too vast for traditional prediction methods, machine learning methods allowed for the definition of novel genomic AML subclasses, indicating that traditional pathomorphologic definitions may be less reflective of overlapping pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.