Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34075372›Full record

ArticleResearch square2021

A Synergistic Mindsets Intervention Protects Adolescents from Social Stress.

David Yeager, Christopher Bryan, James Gross, Danielle Krettek, Pedro Santos, Jared Murray, Hannah Graveling, Meghann Johnson, Jeremy Jamieson

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David YeagerUniversity of Texas at Austin.ORCID 0000-0002-8522-9503
Christopher BryanUniversity of Texas at Austin.ORCID 0000-0002-1582-4411
James GrossStanford University.
Danielle KrettekGoogle Empathy Lab.
Pedro SantosUniversity of Texas at Austin.
Jared MurrayUniversity of Texas, Austin.
Hannah GravelingUniversity of Rochester.
Meghann JohnsonUniversity of Texas at Austin.
Jeremy JamiesonUniversity of Rochester.
The University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Rochester · USGoogle (United States) · USStanford University · US

Funding

Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARK D. HAYWARD · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
Estimating and Understanding Effects of Teaching Teens That People Can ChangeR01HD084772 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI YEAGER, DAVID S · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social stress poses a major threat to adolescent health via its effects on internalizing symptoms, such as anxiety and depression. Available interventions to help adolescents improve their stress responses, however, have not been effective in rigorous evaluation studies, or they have been difficult to administer widely. Here we show that replicable improvements in adolescent stress responses can be achieved with a short (~30-minute), scalable synergistic mindsets intervention. This intervention, which is a self-administered online training module, targets both growth mindsets (the idea that people's intelligence can be developed in response to challenge) and stress-can-be-enhancing mindsets (the idea that people's stress responses can be fuel for optimal performance). Its goal is to promote positive engagement with stressful events (e.g., learning from failure on a quiz or a conflict with a peer) and to encourage adolescents to use their responses to stressful events and even their bodily symptoms (e.g. racing heart, sweaty palms, butterflies in their stomach) to their advantage. In five double-blind, randomized, controlled trials (total N = 4,091 adolescents), the new synergistic mindsets intervention improved stress-related cognitions (Studies 1-2), cardiovascular reactivity (Study 3), daily internalizing symptoms and cortisol levels (Study 4), and generalized anxiety symptoms during the 2020 COVID-19 lockdowns (Study 5). Effects on downstream outcomes (in Studies 3-5) were stronger among individuals who, at baseline, held the two negative mindsets targeted by the intervention, providing evidence for the proposed mechanisms. Confidence in this conclusion comes from a conservative, Bayesian machine-learning method for detecting heterogeneity.

Identifiers

PMID34075372
PMCPMC8168396
OpenAlexW3164484575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.