Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34075350›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Gynecological Cancer Radiation During Complete Nationwide Lockdown: Observations and Reflections From Tertiary Care Institute in India.

Abhishek Shinghal, Sonz Paul, Supriya Chopra, Lavanya Gurram, Libin Scaria, Satish Kohle, Priyanka Rane, Dheera A, John Puravath, Jivanshu Jain and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Gynecologic radiation therapy in low and middle income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2022
    Review
  7. The state of gynecologic radiation therapy in low- and middle-income countries.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abhishek ShinghalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Sonz PaulDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Supriya ChopraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre For Treatment and Education in cancer, Tata Memorial Centre (ACTREC), Parel, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Lavanya GurramDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Libin ScariaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Satish KohleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Priyanka RaneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Dheera ADepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
John PuravathDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Jivanshu JainDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre For Treatment and Education in cancer, Tata Memorial Centre (ACTREC), Parel, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Jamema SwamidasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre For Treatment and Education in cancer, Tata Memorial Centre (ACTREC), Parel, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Jaya GhoshDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, India.
Sudeep GuptaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, India.
Sushmita RathDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, India.
Sarbani Ghosh LaskarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Jai Prakash AgarwalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INTata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report real-world compliance to radiation in gynecologic cancers during the complete lockdown phase of COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From March 23, 2020, until June 30, 2020, complete lockdown was imposed in India. During this period there was restructuring of cancer care and radiation oncology department due to operational policies prevalent in the institution, and the care for gynecological cancer was based on the evolving international recommendations. Institutional review board approval was obtained to audit patterns of care during the complete lockdown phase. Descriptive variables were used to report on patient characteristics, compliance, delays, toxicity, and observed deviations in recommended care.

resultsDuring the lockdown period spanning 100 days, treatment of 270 and telephonic follow-up of 1103 patients with gynecological cancer was undertaken. Of 270 new patients, due to travel restrictions, 90 patients were referred to the facilities in vicinity of their residence. Of the remaining 180 patients, 138 were planned for complete treatment at our institution and 42 were referred to our center for brachytherapy. Of 138 patients, only 106 (76%) completed the planned external radiation. Twenty-four (26%) patients completed full course of concurrent chemotherapy, 11 (12%) received chemotherapy dose reduction, and 57 (62%) received no concurrent chemotherapy. Treatment delay of up to 3 weeks was noted in 8.6% patients due to COVID-19 infection. No grade 4 to 5 acute sequelae were observed. No excess adverse effects were observed in high-risk population. Low rate of symptom burden was observed among 1103 patients on telephonic follow-up. With 100 (9.6%) patients reporting symptoms, among these, 54% (54 of 100) had complete resolution of symptoms within 4 weeks of teleconsultation, and 10% had disease progression.

conclusionsLow compliance with planned treatment was observed for radiation and concurrent chemotherapy due to lockdown and fear of contracting COVID-19 and will likely lead to increased risk of cancer-related mortality. Rapid restructuring of care is needed to prevent the same as COVID-19 pandemic further evolves.

Identifiers

PMID34075350
PMCPMC8159674
OpenAlexW3165151077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.