ArticleJournal of bisexuality2020
Article in Journal of bisexuality, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers to Care Among LGBT Cancer Survivors: An Analysis of the All of Us Research Program.Cancers · 2026Article
- Through their Eyes: A Qualitative, Daily Diary Exploration of Oppression-Based Stress Experiences among Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents.Psychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity · 2024Article
- LGBTQ+ cancer: priority or lip service? A qualitative content analysis of LGBTQ+ considerations in U.S. state, jurisdiction, and tribal comprehensive cancer control plans.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Bi+ Men's Explanations for Substance Use Disparities in Their Community.Journal of bisexuality · 2024Article
- Race and Sexual Identity Differences in PrEP Continuum Outcomes Among Latino Men in a Large Chicago Area Healthcare Network.AIDS and behavior · 2022Article
- Introduction to the special issue: Improving the health of a local bisexual community through the creation of a citywide task force.Journal of bisexuality · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bisexual people comprise over half of all adults who identify as sexual minorities within the United States. Increasingly, population level health research has revealed that bisexual people face striking and broad-ranging health disparities compared not only to heterosexual people, but also often compared to their gay and lesbian peers. Despite the fact that bisexual people comprise an 'invisible majority' of LGBTQ people and are disproportionately impacted by poor health, the vast majority of funding dedicated to LGBTQ community organizing and to sexual and gender minority health research does not address the needs of bisexual people. Within this three-part article, we first describe how manifestations of systematic biphobia have led to the current situation where bisexual community organizations and bisexual health researchers are not granted adequate resources to address the health and health promotion of bisexual populations. In the second section, we articulate foundational ethical guiding principles and propose
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.