Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34075135›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

3-Dimensional ventricular electrical activation pattern assessed from a novel high-frequency electrocardiographic imaging technique: principles and clinical importance.

Pavel Jurak, Laura R Bear, Uyên Châu Nguyên, Ivo Viscor, Petr Andrla, Filip Plesinger, Josef Halamek, Vlastimil Vondra, Emma Abell, Matthijs J M Cluitmans and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06641362 (Pivotal Clinical Study of VDI's Ultra-High Frequency Electrocardiogram), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06641362 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Pivotal Clinical Study of VDI's Ultra-High Frequency Electrocardiogram (UHF-ECG) for the Diagnosis of Ventricular Electrical Dyssynchrony (VED): THE SYNC Study

TypeobservationalSponsorVDI TechnologiesRan2025 to 2027Enrolled360ConditionsBradycardia, Heart Failure, Ventricular DysfunctionArmsUltra High Frequency Electrocardiogram (UHF-ECG)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pavel JurakInstitute of Scientific Instruments, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Kralovopolska 147, Brno, 635 00, Czech Republic. jurak@isibrno.cz.
Laura R BearIHU Liryc, Fondation Bordeaux Université, Pessac-Bordeaux, France.
Uyên Châu NguyênDepartment of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ivo ViscorInstitute of Scientific Instruments, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Kralovopolska 147, Brno, 635 00, Czech Republic.
Petr AndrlaInstitute of Scientific Instruments, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Kralovopolska 147, Brno, 635 00, Czech Republic.
Filip PlesingerInstitute of Scientific Instruments, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Kralovopolska 147, Brno, 635 00, Czech Republic.
Josef HalamekInstitute of Scientific Instruments, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Kralovopolska 147, Brno, 635 00, Czech Republic.
Vlastimil VondraInstitute of Scientific Instruments, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Kralovopolska 147, Brno, 635 00, Czech Republic.
Emma AbellIHU Liryc, Fondation Bordeaux Université, Pessac-Bordeaux, France.
Matthijs J M CluitmansDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rémi DuboisIHU Liryc, Fondation Bordeaux Université, Pessac-Bordeaux, France.
Karol CurilaCardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel LeinveberInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.
Frits W PrinzenDepartment of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study introduces and validates a novel high-frequency (100-400 Hz bandwidth, 2 kHz sampling frequency) electrocardiographic imaging (HFECGI) technique that measures intramural ventricular electrical activation. Ex-vivo experiments and clinical measurements were employed. Ex-vivo, two pig hearts were suspended in a human-torso shaped tank using surface tank electrodes, epicardial electrode sock, and plunge electrodes. We compared conventional epicardial electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) with intramural activation by HFECGI and verified with sock and plunge electrodes. Clinical importance of HFECGI measurements was performed on 14 patients with variable conduction abnormalities. From 3 × 4 needle and 108 sock electrodes, 256 torso or 184 body surface electrodes records, transmural activation times, sock epicardial activation times, ECGI-derived activation times, and high-frequency activation times were computed. The ex-vivo transmural measurements showed that HFECGI measures intramural electrical activation, and ECGI-HFECGI activation times differences indicate endo-to-epi or epi-to-endo conduction direction. HFECGI-derived volumetric dyssynchrony was significantly lower than epicardial ECGI dyssynchrony. HFECGI dyssynchrony was able to distinguish between intraventricular conduction disturbance and bundle branch block patients.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingElectrocardiographyHeart Conduction SystemHeart VentriclesAnimalsHumansSwine

Identifiers

PMID34075135
PMCPMC8169848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.