Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34075126›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Bones geometric morphometrics illustrate 10th millennium cal. BP domestication of autochthonous Cypriot wild boar (Sus scrofa circeus nov. ssp).

Thomas Cucchi, Auriale Domont, Hugo Harbers, Allowen Evin, Roger Alcàntara Fors, Maria Saña, Charlotte Leduc, Aurélie Guidez, Anne Bridault, Hitomi Hongo and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mitochondrial Phylogeography of Wild Boars,Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Pigs as Pets: Early Human Relations with the Sulawesi Warty Pig (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  4. Wild Meets Domestic in the Near Eastern Neolithic.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Thomas CucchiArchéozoologie, Archéobotanique: Sociétés, Pratiques et Environnements, AASPE UMR 7209, CNRS/Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France. cucchi@mnhn.fr.
Auriale DomontArchéozoologie, Archéobotanique: Sociétés, Pratiques et Environnements, AASPE UMR 7209, CNRS/Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
Hugo HarbersArchéozoologie, Archéobotanique: Sociétés, Pratiques et Environnements, AASPE UMR 7209, CNRS/Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
Allowen EvinISEM, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Roger Alcàntara ForsAutonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria SañaAutonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Charlotte LeducTrajectoires, de la Sédentarisation à l'État, UMR 8215, Maison de l'Archéologie et de l'Ethnologie, 21 Allée de l'Université, 92000, Nanterre, France.
Aurélie GuidezArchimède, Archéologie et Histoire Ancienne: Méditerranée Europe, UMR 7044, Université de Strasboug, Strasboug, France.
Anne BridaultArScAn, Equipe Archéologies Environnementales, UMR 7041, CNRS, Maison de l'Archéologie et de l'Ethnologie, 21 Allée de l'Université, 92000, Nanterre, France.
Hitomi HongoDepartment of Evolutionary Studies of Biosystems, School of Advanced Sciences, Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Shonan Village, Hayama, Kanagawa, 240-0193, Japan.
Max PriceDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02143, USA.
Joris PetersArchaeoBioCenter and Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication Research and the History of Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, 80539, Munich, Germany.
François BrioisEHESS, UMR 5608, Travaux et Recherches Archéologiques sur les Cultures, les Espaces et les Sociétés (TRACES), Université Jean Jaurès, Toulouse, France.
Jean GuilaineCollège de France, 11, Place Marcelin-Berthelot, 75005, Paris, France.
Jean-Denis VigneArchéozoologie, Archéobotanique: Sociétés, Pratiques et Environnements, AASPE UMR 7209, CNRS/Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epipaleolithic hunter-gatherers from the Near East introduced wild boars (Sus scrofa) to Cyprus, with the Early Pre-Pottery Neolithic (PPN) settlers hunting the wild descendants of these boars. However, the geographic origin of the Cypriot boar and how they were integrated into the earliest forms of pig husbandry remain unsolved. Here, we present data on 11,000 to 9000 cal. BP Sus scrofa from the PPN sites of Klimonas and Shillourokambos. We compared them to contemporaneous populations from the Near East and to Neolithic and modern populations in Corsica, exploring their origin and evolution using biosystematic signals from molar teeth and heel bones (calcanei), using 2D and 3D geometric morphometrics. We found that the Cypriot PPN lineage of Sus scrofa originates from the Northern Levant. Yet, their phenotypic idiosyncrasy suggest that they evolved into an insular sub-species that we named Sus scrofa circeus, referring to Circe, the metamorphosis goddess that changed Ulysses companions into pigs. The phenotypic homogeneity among PPNA Klimonas wild boars and managed populations of PPNB Shillourokambos suggests that local domestication has been undertaken on the endemic S. s. circeus, strengthening the idea that Cyprus was integrated into the core region of animal domestication.

Indexed as

DomesticationSus scrofaAnimal HusbandryAnimalsHistory, Ancient

Identifiers

PMID34075126
PMCPMC8169896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.