Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34075075›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza.

Anke Hupe, Franziska Naether, Thorsten Haase, Christian Bruns, Jürgen Heß, Jens Dyckmans, Rainer Georg Joergensen, Florian Wichern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anke HupeSoil Biology and Plant Nutrition, University of Kassel, Nordbahnhofstr. 1a, 37213, Witzenhausen, Germany. a.hupe@uni-kassel.de.
Franziska NaetherOrganic Farming and Cropping, University of Kassel, Nordbahnhofstr. 1a, 37213, Witzenhausen, Germany.
Thorsten HaaseOrganic Farming and Cropping, University of Kassel, Nordbahnhofstr. 1a, 37213, Witzenhausen, Germany.
Christian BrunsOrganic Farming and Cropping, University of Kassel, Nordbahnhofstr. 1a, 37213, Witzenhausen, Germany.
Jürgen HeßOrganic Farming and Cropping, University of Kassel, Nordbahnhofstr. 1a, 37213, Witzenhausen, Germany.
Jens DyckmansCentre for Stable Isotope Research Analysis, University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 2, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Rainer Georg JoergensenOrganic Farming and Cropping, University of Kassel, Nordbahnhofstr. 1a, 37213, Witzenhausen, Germany.
Florian WichernSoil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, Rhine-Waal University of Applied Sciences, Marie-Curie-Str. 1, 47533, Kleve, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intercropping of legumes and cereals is an important management method for improving yield stability, especially in organic farming systems. However, knowledge is restricted on the relevance of different nutrient transfer pathways. The objective of the study was to quantify nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) transfer from peas to triticale by (1) direct root contact (= R), (2) arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF; = A), and (3) diffusion (= D). Pea (Pisum sativum cv. Frisson and P2) and triticale (Triticum × Secale cv. Benetto) plants as intercrop were grown for 105 days. Treatment ADR enabled all transfer paths between the two crops. Treatment AD with root exclusion enabled AMF and diffusion transfer between peas and triticale. Treatment A with a diffusion gap barrier only allowed AMF transfer. Pea plants were labelled every 14 days with a

Indexed as

CarbonEdible GrainFabaceaeMycorrhizaeNitrogenPlant RootsCarbonNitrogen

Identifiers

PMID34075075
PMCPMC8169652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.