Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34074873›Full record

ReviewComputers, informatics, nursing : CIN2021

Mobile Health Applications, Cancer Survivors, and Lifestyle Modification: An Integrative Review.

Marjorie M Kelley, Jennifer Kue, Lynne Brophy, Andrea L Peabody, Randi E Foraker, Po-Yin Yen, Sharon Tucker

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Marjorie M KelleyAuthor Affiliations: College of Nursing, The Ohio State University (Drs Kelley, Kue, and Tucker); James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center (Brophy); and EngageHealth, Inc (Peabody), Columbus, OH; and Institute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine (Drs Foraker and Yen); Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University (Dr Foraker); Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine (Dr Yen); and Goldfarb School of Nursing, Barnes-Jewish College, BJC HealthCare (Dr Yen), St Louis, MO.
Jennifer Kue
Lynne Brophy
Andrea L Peabody
Randi E Foraker
Po-Yin Yen
Sharon Tucker
OhioHealth · US

Funding

Extending Automated Heart Health Assessment (AH-HA) for Cancer Survivors to Expand Provider and Patient Reach and Promote SustainabilityR01CA226078 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RANDI E FORAKER, Kathryn Elizabeth Weaver · 2018 to 2026
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA226078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer survivors' well-being is threatened by the risk of cancer recurrence and the increased risk of chronic diseases resulting from cancer treatments. Improving lifestyle behaviors attenuates these risks. Traditional approaches to lifestyle modification (ie, counseling) are expensive, require significant human resources, and are difficult to scale. Mobile health interventions offer a novel alternative to traditional approaches. However, to date, systematic reviews have yet to examine the use of mobile health interventions for lifestyle behavior improvement among cancer survivors. The objectives of this integrative review were to synthesize research findings, critically appraise the scientific literature, examine the use of theory in intervention design, and identify survivors' preferences in using mobile health interventions for lifestyle improvement. Nineteen articles met eligibility requirements. Only two studies used quantitative methods. Study quality was low, and only one study reported the use of theory in app design. Unfortunately, the evidence has not yet sufficiently matured, in quality or in rigor, to make recommendations on how to improve health behaviors or outcomes. However, six themes emerged as important considerations for intervention development for cancer survivors (app features/functionality, social relationships/support, provider relationships/support, app content, app acceptability, and barriers to use). These findings underscored the need for rigorous, efficacy studies before the use of mobile health interventions can be safely recommended for cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsMobile ApplicationsNeoplasmsTelemedicineHealth BehaviorHumansLife Style

Identifiers

PMID34074873
PMCPMC8578050
OpenAlexW3163982059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.