Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34074592›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2022

The role of metabolism in directed differentiation versus trans-differentiation of cardiomyocytes.

James W S Jahng, Mao Zhang, Joseph C Wu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Next-generation direct reprogramming.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Cardiac reprogramming via chromatin remodeling by CRISPR activation.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James W S JahngStanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, School of Medicine, USA.
Mao ZhangStanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, School of Medicine, USA.
Joseph C WuStanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, School of Medicine, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, School of Medicine, USA; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, School of Medicine, USA. Electronic address: joewu@stanford.edu.
Cardiovascular Institute of the South · US

Funding

Elucidating Mechanism of Cardiac Fibrosis with Cell Village of Pooled Human iPSCsR01HL130020 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Ronglih Liao, MARK MERCOLA · 2016 to 2026
$7.3M
Genome Editing of Human iPSCs to Study Inherited Hypertrophic CardiomyopathyR01HL126527 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI QI, LEI STANLEY, WU, JOSEPH C. · 2015 to 2022
$5.4M
Human iPSC Model to Elucidate Metabolic Interplay in Diabetic CardimyopathyR01HL146690 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LIAO, RONGLIH, MERCOLA, MARK · 2019 to 2025
$5.1M
Precision Medicine for Heart Failure: The Role of Genomics in the Efficacy and Racial Disparity of Cornerstone PharmacotherapyK08HL146990 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUZUM, JASMINE A · 2019 to 2023
$772k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL146990NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126527NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130020NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL146690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and identification of transcription factors for cardiac reprogramming have raised hope to cure heart disease, the leading cause of death in the world. Our knowledge in heart development and molecular barriers of cardiac reprogramming is advancing, but many hurdles are yet to be overcome for clinical translation. Importantly, we lack a full understanding of molecular mechanisms governing cell fate conversion toward cardiomyocytes. In this review, we will discuss the role of metabolism in directed differentiation versus trans-differentiation of cardiomyocytes. Cardiomyocytes exhibit a unique metabolic feature distinct from PSCs and cardiac fibroblasts, and there are multiple overlapping molecular mechanisms underlying metabolic reprogramming during cardiomyogenesis. We will discuss key metabolic changes occurring during cardiomyocytes differentiation from PSCs and cardiac fibroblasts, and the potential role of metabolic reprogramming in the enhancement strategies for cardiomyogenesis. Only when such details are discovered will more effective strategies to enhance the de novo production of cardiomyocytes be possible.

Indexed as

Cell TransdifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingFibroblastsHumansMyocytes, CardiacCardiomyocytesDifferentiationFibroblastsIPSCsMetabolismReprogramming

Identifiers

PMID34074592
PMCPMC8725317
OpenAlexW3164311809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.