Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34074289›Full record

Trial reportNutrition journal2021

Effect of probiotic supplementation along with calorie restriction on metabolic endotoxemia, and inflammation markers in coronary artery disease patients: a double blind placebo controlled randomized clinical trial.

Jalal Moludi, Hossein Samadi Kafil, Shaimaa A Qaisar, Pourya Gholizadeh, Mohammad Alizadeh, Hamed Jafari Vayghyan

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrition journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Metabolic syndrome and a broken heart: trust your gut or risk your heart.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jalal MoludiResearch Center for Environmental Determinants of Health (RCEDH), Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran. jmoludi@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8333-414X
Hossein Samadi KafilDrug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Shaimaa A QaisarChemistry Department, College of Education, University of Garmian, Sulimmania, Iraq.
Pourya GholizadehDrug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mohammad AlizadehNutrition Research Center, Faculty of Nutrition, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. mdalizadeh20@gmail.com.
Hamed Jafari VayghyanFaculty of Health, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRArak University of Medical Sciences · IRKermanshah University of Medical Sciences · IRKurdistan Regional Government · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlterations in the gut microbiome (dysbiosis) has been associated with increased microbial translocation, leading to chronic inflammation in coronary artery disease (CAD). It has been proposed that modulation of gut microbiota by probiotic might modify metabolic endotoxemia. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) on endotoxin level, and biomarkers of inflammation in CAD participants.

methodsThis study was a 12-weeks randomized, double-blind, and intervention on 44 patients with CAD. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either one LGG capsule 1.6 × 10

resultsA significant decrease in IL1-Beta concentration (- 1.88 ± 2.25, vs. 0.50 ± 1.58 mmol/L, P = 0.027), and LPS levels (- 5.88 ± 2.70 vs. 2.96+ 5.27 mg/L, P = 0.016), was observed after the probiotic supplementation compared with the placebo. Participants who had ≥2.5 kg weight loss showed significantly improved cardiovascular-related factors, compared to patients with < 2.5 kg weight reduction, regardless of the supplement they took.

conclusionThese data provide preliminary evidence that probiotic supplementation has beneficial effects on metabolic endotoxemia, and mega inflammation in participants with CAD.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseEndotoxemiaProbioticsBiomarkersCaloric RestrictionDietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodHumansInflammationBiomarkersCoronary artery diseaseGut microbiotaLipopolysaccharideMetabolic endotoxmiaProbiotic

Identifiers

PMID34074289
PMCPMC8170788
OpenAlexW3130987663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.