Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34074278›Full record

ReviewBMC health services research2021

How do reminder systems in follow-up screening for women with previous gestational diabetes work? - a realist review.

Jane Hyldgaard Nielsen, G J Melendez-Torres, Torill Alise Rotevatn, Kimberly Peven, Kirsten Fonager, Charlotte Overgaard

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pregnancy as an opportunity to prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus: FIGO Best Practice Advice.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jane Hyldgaard NielsenDepartment of Midwifery, University College of Northern Denmark, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 2, 9220, Aalborg Øst, Denmark. Jhy@ucn.dk.
G J Melendez-TorresPeninsula Technology Assessment Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Torill Alise RotevatnPublic Health and Epidemiology Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Niels Jernes Vej, 14, 9220, Aalborg Øst, Denmark.
Kimberly PevenFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Department of Child and Family Health Nursing, Kings College London, London, UK.
Kirsten FonagerDepartment of Social Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Charlotte OvergaardPublic Health and Epidemiology Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Niels Jernes Vej, 14, 9220, Aalborg Øst, Denmark.
Aalborg University · DKCardiff University · GBKing's College London · GBPeninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with previous gestational diabetes have an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes later in life. Recommendations therefore urge these women to participate in follow-up screening, 4-12 weeks postpartum and every 1-3 years thereafter. We sought to theorize how reminder interventions to support early detection of diabetes work, for whom, and in what circumstances.

methodsWe used a method informed by realist review and synthesis. A systematic, iterative search in six electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE Ovid, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EMBASE) had a primary focus on experimental intervention studies and included additional information in relation to identified intervention studies. Analysis inductively identified context-mechanism-outcome configurations present in the evidence.

resultsWe located 16 articles eligible for inclusion. A cross-case comparison identified seven grouped context-mechanism-outcome configurations leading to intervention mechanisms relating to changes in women's reasoning and behavior. Configurations were thematically ordered in relation to Systems Resources, Women's Circumstances, and Continuity of Care. These were mapped onto a socio-ecological model and discussed according to identified middle-range theories.

conclusionOur findings adds to the body of evidence, that reminders have the potential to be effective in increasing participation in the recommended follow-up screening. Our study may assist researchers and policy and decision makers to analyze and judge if reminders are feasible and/or likely to succeed in their specific context. Further research into the perspective of socially disadvantaged and overweight women is needed to avoid unintended consequences such as social inequality in service use and stigmatization in future programs.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancyReminder SystemsComplex interventionsContext-mechanism-outcome configurationsCritical realismEvaluationFollow-up screeningGestational diabetes mellitusHealth preventionHealth researchKnowledge translationRealist reviewReminderType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID34074278
PMCPMC8167960
OpenAlexW3164043797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.