ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021
In silico drug repositioning using deep learning and comprehensive similarity measures.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategies for robust, accurate, and generalizable benchmarking of drug discovery platforms.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- A comprehensive landscape of AI applications in broad-spectrum drug interaction prediction: a systematic review.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Review
- Strategies for robust, accurate, and generalizable benchmarking of drug discovery platforms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Literature data-based de novo candidates for drug repurposing.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- CDPMF-DDA: contrastive deep probabilistic matrix factorization for drug-disease association prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Translational Informatics Driven Drug Repositioning for Neurodegenerative Disease.Current neuropharmacology · 2025Review
- Calculating the similarity between prescriptions to find their new indications based on graph neural network.Chinese medicine · 2024Article
- DDIT: An Online Predictor for Multiple Clinical Phenotypic Drug-Disease Associations.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDrug repositioning, meanings finding new uses for existing drugs, which can accelerate the processing of new drugs research and development. Various computational methods have been presented to predict novel drug-disease associations for drug repositioning based on similarity measures among drugs and diseases. However, there are some known associations between drugs and diseases that previous studies not utilized.
methodsIn this work, we develop a deep gated recurrent units model to predict potential drug-disease interactions using comprehensive similarity measures and Gaussian interaction profile kernel. More specifically, the similarity measure is used to exploit discriminative feature for drugs based on their chemical fingerprints. Meanwhile, the Gaussian interactions profile kernel is employed to obtain efficient feature of diseases based on known disease-disease associations. Then, a deep gated recurrent units model is developed to predict potential drug-disease interactions.
resultsThe performance of the proposed model is evaluated on two benchmark datasets under tenfold cross-validation. And to further verify the predictive ability, case studies for predicting new potential indications of drugs were carried out.
conclusionThe experimental results proved the proposed model is a useful tool for predicting new indications for drugs or new treatments for diseases, and can accelerate drug repositioning and related drug research and discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.