Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34073757›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Factors Influencing Public Attitudes towards COVID-19 Vaccination: A Scoping Review Informed by the Socio-Ecological Model.

Ghadir Fakhri Al-Jayyousi, Mohamed Abdelhady Mabrouk Sherbash, Lamees Abdullah Mohammed Ali, Asmaa El-Heneidy, Nour Waleed Zuhair Alhussaini, Manar Elsheikh Abdelrahman Elhassan, Maisa Ayman Nazzal

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ghadir Fakhri Al-JayyousiDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-5995-1693
Mohamed Abdelhady Mabrouk SherbashDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.
Lamees Abdullah Mohammed AliDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-4455-5601
Asmaa El-HeneidySchool of Medicine and Dentistry and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia.
Nour Waleed Zuhair AlhussainiDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.
Manar Elsheikh Abdelrahman ElhassanDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-9968-9853
Maisa Ayman NazzalDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An Najah National University, Nablus 44839, West Bank, Palestine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major hindrances to getting a COVID-19 vaccine include vaccine hesitancy, skepticism, refusal, and anti-vaccine movements. Several studies have been conducted on attitudes of the public towards COVID-19 vaccines and the potential influencing factors. The purpose of this scoping review is to summarize the data available on the various factors influencing public attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination. This scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Statement. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central were searched without restrictions to reclaim all publications on the factors that shape individuals' attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines from 1 January 2020 to 15 February 2021. Fifty studies were included. The scoping review revealed that the factors influencing public attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines were embedded within the different levels of the socio-ecological model. These factors included the sociodemographic characteristics of the individuals, individual factors, social and organizational factors. In addition, certain characteristics of COVID-19 vaccines themselves influenced public attitudes towards accepting the vaccines. Understanding various population needs and the factors shaping public attitudes towards the vaccines would support planning for evidence-based multilevel interventions in order to enhance global vaccine uptake.

Indexed as

acceptanceCOVID-19ecological modelhesitancyrefusalscoping reviewvaccinewillingness

Identifiers

PMID34073757
PMCPMC8225013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.