ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
Classification of Monocytes, Promonocytes and Monoblasts Using Deep Neural Network Models: An Area of Unmet Need in Diagnostic Hematopathology.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- EfficientNet-B0-Based Screening of WBC-Diff Scattergram Images for Hematological Abnormalities.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning Model for IMMP-Based Residual Disease Monitoring in AML with Monocytic Differentiation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- ICSH Recommendations for Monocyte Cell Lineage Morphologic Identification, Nomenclature Harmonization, and Utilization as a Biomarker.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Review
- Temporary effects of random positioning on the function and plasticity of proliferating monocytes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An integrative multiparametric approach stratifies putative distinct phenotypes of blast phase chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the practical application of the category-imbalanced myeloid cell classification model.PloS one · 2025Article
- VFM-SSL-BMADCC-Framework: vision foundation model and self-supervised learning based automated framework for differential cell counts on whole-slide bone marrow aspirate smears.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- DeepHeme: A generalizable, bone marrow classifier with hematopathologist-level performance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence-An Updated Overview.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Short histological kaleidoscope - recent findings in histology. Part III.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accurate diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) subtypes with monocytic differentiation relies on the proper identification and quantitation of blast cells and blast-equivalent cells, including promonocytes. This distinction can be quite challenging given the cytomorphologic and immunophenotypic similarities among the monocytic cell precursors. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNN) in separating monocytes from their precursors (i.e., promonocytes and monoblasts). We collected digital images of 935 monocytic cells that were blindly reviewed by five experienced morphologists and assigned into three subtypes: monocyte, promonocyte, and blast. The consensus between reviewers was considered as a ground truth reference label for each cell. In order to assess the performance of CNN models, we divided our data into training (70%), validation (10%), and test (20%) datasets, as well as applied fivefold cross validation. The CNN models did not perform well for predicting three monocytic subtypes, but their performance was significantly improved for two subtypes (monocyte vs. promonocytes + blasts). Our findings (1) support the concept that morphologic distinction between monocytic cells of various differentiation level is difficult; (2) suggest that combining blasts and promonocytes into a single category is desirable for improved accuracy; and (3) show that CNN models can reach accuracy comparable to human reviewers (0.78 ± 0.10 vs. 0.86 ± 0.05). As far as we know, this is the first study to separate monocytes from their precursors using CNN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.