Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34073656›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2021

Louisa Wirtz, Nelson Sidnei Massola Júnior, Renata Rebellato Linhares de Castro, Brigitte Ruge-Wehling, Ulrich Schaffrath, Marco Loehrer

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endophytic fungusFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Louisa WirtzDepartment of Plant Physiology, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8623-8647
Nelson Sidnei Massola JúniorDepartment of Plant Pathology and Nematology, ESALQ, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba 13418-900, SP, Brazil.
Renata Rebellato Linhares de CastroDepartment of Plant Pathology and Nematology, ESALQ, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba 13418-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9488-7164
Brigitte Ruge-WehlingInstitute for Breeding Research on Agricultural Crops, Julius Kühn-Institut, 18190 Groß Lüsewitz, Germany.
Ulrich SchaffrathDepartment of Plant Physiology, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3691-0888
Marco LoehrerDepartment of Plant Physiology, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3740-0855
RWTH Aachen University · DEUniversidade de São Paulo · BRJulius Kühn-Institut · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein crop plants such as soybean and lupin are attracting increasing attention because of their potential use as forage, green manure, or for the production of oil and protein for human consumption. Whereas soybean production only recently gained more importance in Germany and within the whole EU in frame of protein strategies, lupin production is already well-established in Germany. The cultivation of lupins is impeded by the hemibiotrophic ascomycete

Indexed as

anthracnoseColletotrichumcommensalismlupinmutualismparasitismplant growth-promoting effectprotein crop plantsoybean

Identifiers

PMID34073656
PMCPMC8224748
OpenAlexW3165064400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.