Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34073627›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Artificial Intelligence Based Algorithms for Prostate Cancer Classification and Detection on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Narrative Review.

Jasper J Twilt, Kicky G van Leeuwen, Henkjan J Huisman, Jurgen J Fütterer, Maarten de Rooij

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06401434 (EVALUATE), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06401434 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

EVALUATE: Estimating the Value-Add of Lunit Software's Use to Accelerate TB Elimination

TypeinterventionalSponsorFreundeskreis Für Internationale Tuberkulosehilfe e.VRan2024 to 2025Enrolled23,835ConditionsTuberculosisArmsOn-site radiologist, CAD-based triage (with INSIGHT CXR software)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jasper J TwiltDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9673-6770
Kicky G van LeeuwenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8902-5161
Henkjan J HuismanDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6753-3221
Jurgen J FüttererDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Maarten de RooijDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Horizon 2020 952159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the upfront role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis, a multitude of artificial intelligence (AI) applications have been suggested to aid in the diagnosis and detection of PCa. In this review, we provide an overview of the current field, including studies between 2018 and February 2021, describing AI algorithms for (1) lesion classification and (2) lesion detection for PCa. Our evaluation of 59 included studies showed that most research has been conducted for the task of PCa lesion classification (66%) followed by PCa lesion detection (34%). Studies showed large heterogeneity in cohort sizes, ranging between 18 to 499 patients (median = 162) combined with different approaches for performance validation. Furthermore, 85% of the studies reported on the stand-alone diagnostic accuracy, whereas 15% demonstrated the impact of AI on diagnostic thinking efficacy, indicating limited proof for the clinical utility of PCa AI applications. In order to introduce AI within the clinical workflow of PCa assessment, robustness and generalizability of AI applications need to be further validated utilizing external validation and clinical workflow experiments.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputer-aided diagnosisdeep learningmachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingprostate neoplasmsradiomics

Identifiers

PMID34073627
PMCPMC8229869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.