Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34073456›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2021

Biomedical Text Link Prediction for Drug Discovery: A Case Study with COVID-19.

Kevin McCoy, Sateesh Gudapati, Lawrence He, Elaina Horlander, David Kartchner, Soham Kulkarni, Nidhi Mehra, Jayant Prakash, Helena Thenot, Sri Vivek Vanga and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. BioSift: A Dataset for Filtering Biomedical Abstracts for Drug Repurposing and Clinical Meta-Analysis.International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Annual International ACMSIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval · 2023
    Article
  13. Paving New Roads UsingIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. CompositeView: A Network-Based Visualization Tool.Big data and cognitive computing · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kevin McCoyLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Sateesh GudapatiLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Lawrence HeLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Elaina HorlanderLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
David KartchnerLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Soham KulkarniLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0546-7980
Nidhi MehraLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Jayant PrakashLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Helena ThenotLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Sri Vivek VangaLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Abigail WagnerLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Brandon WhiteLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8070-9778
Cassie S MitchellLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.

Funding

A Big Data Approach to BCR ABL LeukemiasR21CA232249 · NCI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MITCHELL, CASSIE S · 2019 to 2020
$358k
Alzheimer's Association 2018-AARGD-591014Children's Hospital of Atlanta Aflac Pilot Grant Award N/AGeorgia Institute of Technology President's Undergraduate Research Awards N/ANational Science Foundation 1944247NCI NIH HHS R21 CA232249NIH HHS R21-CA232249Whitaker Biomedical Engineering Seed Grant for COVID-19 N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Link prediction in artificial intelligence is used to identify missing links or derive future relationships that can occur in complex networks. A link prediction model was developed using the complex heterogeneous biomedical knowledge graph, SemNet, to predict missing links in biomedical literature for drug discovery. A web application visualized knowledge graph embeddings and link prediction results using TransE, CompleX, and RotatE based methods. The link prediction model achieved up to 0.44 hits@10 on the entity prediction tasks. The recent outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), also known as COVID-19, served as a case study to demonstrate the efficacy of link prediction modeling for drug discovery. The link prediction algorithm guided identification and ranking of repurposed drug candidates for SARS-CoV-2 primarily by text mining biomedical literature from previous coronaviruses, including SARS and middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS). Repurposed drugs included potential primary SARS-CoV-2 treatment, adjunctive therapies, or therapeutics to treat side effects. The link prediction accuracy for nodes ranked highly for SARS coronavirus was 0.875 as calculated by human in the loop validation on existing COVID-19 specific data sets. Drug classes predicted as highly ranked include anti-inflammatory, nucleoside analogs, protease inhibitors, antimalarials, envelope proteins, and glycoproteins. Examples of highly ranked predicted links to SARS-CoV-2: human leukocyte interferon, recombinant interferon-gamma, cyclosporine, antiviral therapy, zidovudine, chloroquine, vaccination, methotrexate, artemisinin, alkaloids, glycyrrhizic acid, quinine, flavonoids, amprenavir, suramin, complement system proteins, fluoroquinolones, bone marrow transplantation, albuterol, ciprofloxacin, quinolone antibacterial agents, and hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors. Approximately 40% of identified drugs were not previously connected to SARS, such as edetic acid or biotin. In summary, link prediction can effectively suggest repurposed drugs for emergent diseases.

Indexed as

coronavirusCOVID-19literature reviewmachine learningnatural language processingrepurposed drugsSARS-CoV-2text mining

Identifiers

PMID34073456
PMCPMC8230210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.