Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34073412›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

The Long-Term Prognostic Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Ovarian Cancer-A Study of the OVCAD Consortium.

Eva Obermayr, Angelika Reiner, Burkhard Brandt, Elena Ioana Braicu, Alexander Reinthaller, Liselore Loverix, Nicole Concin, Linn Woelber, Sven Mahner, Jalid Sehouli and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Eva ObermayrDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6324-2961
Angelika ReinerDepartment of Pathology, Klinikum Donaustadt, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4497-1864
Burkhard BrandtInstitute of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3681-3049
Elena Ioana BraicuDepartment of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Alexander ReinthallerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7205-0985
Liselore LoverixDivision of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Nicole ConcinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Linn WoelberDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Sven MahnerDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Jalid SehouliDepartment of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Ignace VergoteDivision of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Robert ZeillingerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATUniversität Hamburg · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKU Leuven · BEDonauspital · ATInnsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe previously reported the prognostic impact of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in a multicenter study on minimal residual disease in primary ovarian cancer. With additional follow-up data, we evaluated the combined CTC approach (CTCs MATERIAL AND

methodsBlood samples taken at baseline and six months after adjuvant treatment (follow-up) were assessed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) measuring PPIC transcripts and immunofluorescent staining (IF). A positive result with either IF or qPCR was classified as CTC

resultsThe concordance of IF and qPCR was 65% at baseline and 83% after treatment. Results showed that 50.5% of the baseline and 29.5% of the follow-up samples were CTC DISCUSSION: The two-sided analytical approach revealed CTC subpopulations associated with ovarian cancer progression and may illuminate a potential treatment-related shift in molecular phenotypes. That approach can identify patients who have elevated risk of recurrence and death due to ovarian cancer and who may require risk-adapted treatment strategies.

Indexed as

circulating tumor cellslong-term survivalprimary epithelial ovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID34073412
PMCPMC8198007
OpenAlexW3165807169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.