Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34073350›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Structure and Dynamics of Meprin β in Complex with a Hydroxamate-Based Inhibitor.

Miriam Linnert, Claudia Fritz, Christian Jäger, Dagmar Schlenzig, Daniel Ramsbeck, Martin Kleinschmidt, Michael Wermann, Hans-Ulrich Demuth, Christoph Parthier, Stephan Schilling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ELAPOR1 is a copper-dependent tethering factor driving proacrosomal vesicle fusion during acrosome biogenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Meprin β Modulates Brevican Proteolysis Impairing Neural Plasticity and Memory Formation.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Miriam LinnertFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Department of Drug Design and Target Validation, Weinbergweg 22, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5337-4765
Claudia FritzFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Department of Drug Design and Target Validation, Weinbergweg 22, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4029-4480
Christian JägerVivoryon Therapeutics N. V., Weinbergweg 22, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.
Dagmar SchlenzigFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Department of Drug Design and Target Validation, Weinbergweg 22, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.
Daniel RamsbeckFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Department of Drug Design and Target Validation, Weinbergweg 22, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4966-142X
Martin KleinschmidtFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Department of Drug Design and Target Validation, Weinbergweg 22, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2128-9101
Michael WermannFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Department of Drug Design and Target Validation, Weinbergweg 22, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.
Hans-Ulrich DemuthFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Department of Drug Design and Target Validation, Weinbergweg 22, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.
Christoph ParthierInstitute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Charles-Tanford-Proteinzentrum, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Kurt-Mothes-Street 3a, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7740-8117
Stephan SchillingFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Department of Drug Design and Target Validation, Weinbergweg 22, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The astacin protease Meprin β represents an emerging target for drug development due to its potential involvement in disorders such as acute and chronic kidney injury and fibrosis. Here, we elaborate on the structural basis of inhibition by a specific Meprin β inhibitor. Our analysis of the crystal structure suggests different binding modes of the inhibitor to the active site. This flexibility is caused, at least in part, by movement of the C-terminal region of the protease domain (CTD). The CTD movement narrows the active site cleft upon inhibitor binding. Compared with other astacin proteases, among these the highly homologous isoenzyme Meprin α, differences in the subsites account for the unique selectivity of the inhibitor. Although the inhibitor shows substantial flexibility in orientation within the active site, the structural data as well as binding analyses, including molecular dynamics simulations, support a contribution of electrostatic interactions, presumably by arginine residues, to binding and specificity. Collectively, the results presented here and previously support an induced fit and substantial movement of the CTD upon ligand binding and, possibly, during catalysis. To the best of our knowledge, we here present the first structure of a Meprin β holoenzyme containing a zinc ion and a specific inhibitor bound to the active site. The structural data will guide rational drug design and the discovery of highly potent Meprin inhibitors.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationHumansHydroxamic AcidsMetalloendopeptidasesProtease InhibitorsStructure-Activity RelationshipHydroxamic Acidsmeprin AMetalloendopeptidasesProtease InhibitorsastacinhydroxamateMeprin BMeprin betametalloproteinaseMWT-S-270SAR (structure activity relationship)

Identifiers

PMID34073350
PMCPMC8197800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.