ReviewPharmaceutics2021
Microfluidic and Lab-on-a-Chip Systems for Cutaneous Wound Healing Studies.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Review
- Hydrogel-Based Platforms for Wound Care: Integrated Strategies for Antimicrobial Delivery and Biofilm Management.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Engineering the Healing Process: Advanced In Vitro Wound Models and Technologies.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Microfluidics, 3D bioprinted scaffold and organ-on-chip with biosensing activated therapeutic strategies for diabetic wound healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Microfluidic technologies for wearable and implantable biomedical devices.Lab on a chip · 2025Review
- A Microfluidic System for Real-Time Monitoring and In Situ Metabolite Detection of Plasma-Enhanced Wound Healing.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Injury-on-a-chip for modelling microvascular trauma-induced coagulation.Lab on a chip · 2025Article
- A programmable, open-source robot that scratches cultured tissues to investigate cell migration, healing, and tissue sculpting.Cell reports methods · 2024Article
- Cell Migration Assays and Their Application to Wound Healing Assays-A Critical Review.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Beginning of the era of Organ-on-Chip models in osteoarthritis research.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Article
- Exploring Skin Wound Healing Models and the Impact of Natural Lipids on the Healing Process.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Consideration of Commercially Available Hepatocytes as Cell Sources for Liver-Microphysiological Systems by Comparing Liver Characteristics.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization Methods for Evaluation of Modern Wound Dressings.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous wound healing is a complex, multi-stage process involving direct and indirect cell communication events with the aim of efficiently restoring the barrier function of the skin. One key aspect in cutaneous wound healing is associated with cell movement and migration into the physically, chemically, and biologically injured area, resulting in wound closure. Understanding the conditions under which cell migration is impaired and elucidating the cellular and molecular mechanisms that improve healing dynamics are therefore crucial in devising novel therapeutic strategies to elevate patient suffering, reduce scaring, and eliminate chronic wounds. Following the global trend towards the automation, miniaturization, and integration of cell-based assays into microphysiological systems, conventional wound healing assays such as the scratch assay and cell exclusion assay have recently been translated and improved using microfluidics and lab-on-a-chip technologies. These miniaturized cell analysis systems allow for precise spatial and temporal control over a range of dynamic microenvironmental factors including shear stress, biochemical and oxygen gradients to create more reliable in vitro models that resemble the in vivo microenvironment of a wound more closely on a molecular, cellular, and tissue level. The current review provides (a) an overview on the main molecular and cellular processes that take place during wound healing, (b) a brief introduction into conventional in vitro wound healing assays, and (c) a perspective on future cutaneous and vascular wound healing research using microfluidic technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.