Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34073297›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2021

Perspectives of Microscopy Methods for Morphology Characterisation of Extracellular Vesicles from Human Biofluids.

Mladenka Malenica, Marija Vukomanović, Mario Kurtjak, Valentina Masciotti, Simone Dal Zilio, Silvio Greco, Marco Lazzarino, Vedrana Krušić, Marko Perčić, Ivana Jelovica Badovinac and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Therapeutic Potential of Extracellular Vesicles in Oral Inflammation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Exosome-Based Therapeutics in Dermatology.Biomaterials research · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Mladenka MalenicaDepartment of Physiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, HR-51000 Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-9030-5339
Marija VukomanovićAdvanced Materials Department, Jožef Stefan Institute, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-7034-0471
Mario KurtjakAdvanced Materials Department, Jožef Stefan Institute, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-2334-5920
Valentina MasciottiCNR-IOM Istituto Officina dei Materiali-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche c/Area Scinece Park, Basovizza, I-34149 Trieste, Italy.
Simone Dal ZilioCNR-IOM Istituto Officina dei Materiali-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche c/Area Scinece Park, Basovizza, I-34149 Trieste, Italy.
Silvio GrecoA. P. E. Research srl, I-34151 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5736-5161
Marco LazzarinoCNR-IOM Istituto Officina dei Materiali-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche c/Area Scinece Park, Basovizza, I-34149 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1077-6569
Vedrana KrušićDepartment of Physiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, HR-51000 Rijeka, Croatia.
Marko PerčićFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, HR-51000 Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-5873-0263
Ivana Jelovica BadovinacCentre for Micro- and Nanosciences and Technologies, University of Rijeka, HR-51000 Rijeka, Croatia.
Karmen WechtersbachFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Pathology, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ivona VidovićDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Rijeka, HR-51000 Rijeka, Croatia.
Vanja BaričevićDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Rijeka, HR-51000 Rijeka, Croatia.
Srećko ValićDepartment of Medical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, HR-51000 Rijeka, Croatia.
Pero LučinDepartment of Physiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, HR-51000 Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-8776-8634
Nika KojcFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Pathology, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-1893-4349
Kristina GrabušićDepartment of Physiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, HR-51000 Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-4165-0291

Funding

Croatian Science Foundation grant No. IP-2019-04-1511 to KGEU-H2020 research and innovation programme benefitted from the access provided by CNR-IOM in Trieste (Italy) within the framework of the NFFA-Europe Transnational Access Activity. No. 654360, ID 410 to KG, ID 646 to MMResearch Infrastructure for Campus-based Laboratories at the University of Rijeka project, co-funded by the European Fund for Regional Development (ERDF) and Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of the Republic of Croatia. RC.2.2.06-0001Slovenian Agency (ARRS) P2-0091 and N2-0150 to MVUniversity of Rijeka No. uniri-biomed-18-279 to MM, uniri-biomed-18-5 to KG, uniri-tehnik-18-294 to SV
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanometric membranous structures secreted from almost every cell and present in biofluids. Because EV composition reflects the state of its parental tissue, EVs possess an enormous diagnostic/prognostic potential to reveal pathophysiological conditions. However, a prerequisite for such usage of EVs is their detailed characterisation, including visualisation which is mainly achieved by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and electron microscopy (EM). Here we summarise the EV preparation protocols for AFM and EM bringing out the main challenges in the imaging of EVs, both in their natural environment as biofluid constituents and in a saline solution after EV isolation. In addition, we discuss approaches for EV imaging and identify the potential benefits and disadvantages when different AFM and EM methods are applied, including numerous factors that influence the morphological characterisation, standardisation, or formation of artefacts. We also demonstrate the effects of some of these factors by using cerebrospinal fluid as an example of human biofluid with a simpler composition. Here presented comparison of approaches to EV imaging should help to estimate the current state in morphology research of EVs from human biofluids and to identify the most efficient pathways towards the standardisation of sample preparation and microscopy modes.

Indexed as

atomic force microscopyelectron microscopyextracellular vesicleshuman biofluidsmorphologynanotechnology

Identifiers

PMID34073297
PMCPMC8228884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.