ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021
Current Strategies for the Regeneration of Skeletal Muscle Tissue.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of 810 nm low-level laser therapy on muscle regeneration after bupivacaine-induced myonecrosis in a rabbit model.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Toward an Integrated Strategy for Volumetric Muscle Loss Regeneration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Effects ofBiology · 2026Article
- Recent advances in electroactive biomaterials and electrical stimulation for skeletal muscle regeneration: materials, strategies, and mechanistic insights.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Hybrid 3D-printed/electrospun scaffolds drive myogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cell biomechanics on muscle atrophy: from intricate mechanisms to therapeutic frontiers.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- A novel protocol for the direct isolation of a highly pure and regenerative population of satellite stem cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Next-Generation Biomaterials for Load-Bearing Tissue Interfaces: Sensor-Integrated Scaffolds and Mechanoadaptive Constructs for Skeletal Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Freeze-Dried Porous Collagen Scaffolds for the Repair of Volumetric Muscle Loss Injuries.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- A Facile Strategy for Preparing Flexible and Porous Hydrogel-Based Scaffolds from Silk Sericin/Wool Keratin by In Situ Bubble-Forming for Muscle Tissue Engineering Applications.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
- Areca nut extract exposure disrupts myogenesis and metabolism in C2C12 cells.Current research in toxicology · 2025Article
- Review
- Freeze-dried porous collagen scaffolds for the repair of volumetric muscle loss injuries.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Tissue Engineered 3D Constructs for Volumetric Muscle Loss.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Review
- Citric Acid: A Nexus Between Cellular Mechanisms and Biomaterial Innovations.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024Review
- Development of porcine skeletal muscle extracellular matrix-derived hydrogels with improved properties and low immunogenicity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Production of Proliferation- and Differentiation-Competent Porcine Myoblasts for Preclinical Studies in a Porcine Large Animal Model of Muscular Insufficiency.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effect of GelMA Hydrogel Properties on Long-Term Encapsulation and Myogenic Differentiation of CGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Soft Tissue Regenerative Medicine: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- A Critical Review on Classified Excipient Sodium-Alginate-Based Hydrogels: Modification, Characterization, and Application in Soft Tissue Engineering.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic injuries, tumor resections, and degenerative diseases can damage skeletal muscle and lead to functional impairment and severe disability. Skeletal muscle regeneration is a complex process that depends on various cell types, signaling molecules, architectural cues, and physicochemical properties to be successful. To promote muscle repair and regeneration, various strategies for skeletal muscle tissue engineering have been developed in the last decades. However, there is still a high demand for the development of new methods and materials that promote skeletal muscle repair and functional regeneration to bring approaches closer to therapies in the clinic that structurally and functionally repair muscle. The combination of stem cells, biomaterials, and biomolecules is used to induce skeletal muscle regeneration. In this review, we provide an overview of different cell types used to treat skeletal muscle injury, highlight current strategies in biomaterial-based approaches, the importance of topography for the successful creation of functional striated muscle fibers, and discuss novel methods for muscle regeneration and challenges for their future clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.